Narrative:

On the descent into iad; we were cleared to descend via the hyper arrival. Approaching mowat; we were still at 7000 feet and should have been descending to 5000 as published. We told the controller that we probably could not make that. He replied; 'no problem; just give me your best rate down'; which we did. This was my error and mine alone. Some extenuating circumstances that contributed to the distraction were: 1. Winds were out of the west at 30g36 2. Approach was to be ILS 1R circle to land runway 30 3. I had actually picked up this trip because I was feeling 'non-current' and was to be only my third approach of the month. (Had even tried to pick up trips over thanksgiving; but was unsuccessful). I was trying to focus on the winds and circling; but should not have let that impact flying the arrival. No excuses; I still should have started down sooner. During the approach; we had originally planned flaps 3 and a 1R landing due to the high crosswinds. When that was changed to runway 30; I decided to go back to flaps full. I did keep the flaps at 3 for much of the circle and did not call for flaps full until approaching 500 feet (weather was clear below 5000 feet so visual conditions applied). I leveled off to ensure they would be down and locked before 500; but may have momentarily dipped below; so I cannot say for sure. I can say that considering the high winds; the circling approach; and that we were on speed and on profile within seconds of 500 feet; I felt landing was the appropriate thing to do.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A320 Flight Crew Reports missing a crossing restriction during the HYPER arrival to IAD then having an unstabilized approach during a circle to land Runway 30 from the ILS 1R.

Narrative: On the descent into IAD; we were cleared to descend via the HYPER arrival. Approaching MOWAT; we were still at 7000 feet and should have been descending to 5000 as published. We told the controller that we probably could not make that. He replied; 'No problem; just give me your best rate down'; which we did. This was my error and mine alone. Some extenuating circumstances that contributed to the distraction were: 1. Winds were out of the west at 30G36 2. Approach was to be ILS 1R circle to land Runway 30 3. I had actually picked up this trip because I was feeling 'non-current' and was to be only my third approach of the month. (Had even tried to pick up trips over Thanksgiving; but was unsuccessful). I was trying to focus on the winds and circling; but should not have let that impact flying the arrival. No excuses; I still should have started down sooner. During the approach; we had originally planned flaps 3 and a 1R landing due to the high crosswinds. When that was changed to Runway 30; I decided to go back to flaps full. I did keep the flaps at 3 for much of the circle and did not call for flaps full until approaching 500 feet (weather was clear below 5000 feet so visual conditions applied). I leveled off to ensure they would be down and locked before 500; but may have momentarily dipped below; so I cannot say for sure. I can say that considering the high winds; the circling approach; and that we were on speed and on profile within seconds of 500 feet; I felt landing was the appropriate thing to do.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.