37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 865924 |
Time | |
Date | 200912 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | IWS.Airport |
State Reference | TX |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Super King Air 200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 43 Flight Crew Total 5315 Flight Crew Type 625 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
How problem arose: on the VOR D approach to iws; as I made my turn to circle I may have descended below MDA. I turned up downwind lost sight of the runway and executed a missed approach. I requested the GPS approach to iws; landing was uneventful. Low IFR IMC ceiling's were ragged. Eyes outside the cockpit when I had a visual on the runway. How it was discovered: as I made my turn to circle I glanced at my altimeter I was under 500 ft MSL and made the corrections. Climbed to MDA and executed missed approach. Human performance considerations: weather reports caused me to anticipate low visibility and a possible missed approach. Hindsight I should have planned to land at a different airport with an ILS. Actions/in actions: by not keeping up a better scan I may have descended below minimum. Keeping my IMC scan quicker will assist in preventing future episodes. Factors: the weather was forecast to improve prior to my arrival at iws. The weather did not improve upon arrival. In the future; I will make greater efforts; in the interest of safety; to keep my cockpit scan up to speed. Plan to use airports that have precision approaches when weather conditions are unfavorable.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: BE20 pilot reports descending below minimums while attempting to circle for landing at minimums off the VOR D approach to IWS. A missed approach ensued and the next approach using a straight in GPS approach was successful.
Narrative: How problem arose: On the VOR D Approach to IWS; as I made my turn to circle I may have descended below MDA. I turned up downwind lost sight of the runway and executed a missed approach. I requested the GPS Approach to IWS; landing was uneventful. Low IFR IMC ceiling's were ragged. Eyes outside the cockpit when I had a visual on the runway. How it was discovered: As I made my turn to circle I glanced at my altimeter I was under 500 FT MSL and made the corrections. Climbed to MDA and executed missed approach. Human Performance Considerations: Weather reports caused me to anticipate low visibility and a possible missed approach. Hindsight I should have planned to land at a different airport with an ILS. Actions/In actions: By not keeping up a better scan I may have descended below minimum. Keeping my IMC scan quicker will assist in preventing future episodes. Factors: The weather was forecast to improve prior to my arrival at IWS. The weather did not improve upon arrival. In the future; I will make greater efforts; in the interest of safety; to keep my cockpit scan up to speed. Plan to use airports that have Precision approaches when weather conditions are unfavorable.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.