37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 873195 |
Time | |
Date | 201002 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | STL.Tower |
State Reference | MO |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Route In Use | Other Instrument Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Local |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Person 2 | |
Function | Local |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Three air carrier aircraft had to have approach canceled for collapsing spacing on final. Additionally; breaking action advisories were in effect for the landing runway due to snow and conditions were deteriorating. Approach control was advised of the need for more spacing on final but did not provide it. There were subsequent missed approaches for decreasing separation after I was relieved. Recommendation; a proper response to a call for increased spacing would be to provide it; to avoid a situation where the collapse rate on final would prohibit multiple subsequent approaches from being able to be completed. It would seem to be more efficient than working the aircraft involved twice.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: STL Tower Controller described multiple go around events claiming approach control in-trail spacing was inadequate.
Narrative: Three air carrier aircraft had to have approach canceled for collapsing spacing on final. Additionally; breaking action advisories were in effect for the landing runway due to snow and conditions were deteriorating. Approach Control was advised of the need for more spacing on final but did not provide it. There were subsequent missed approaches for decreasing separation after I was relieved. Recommendation; a proper response to a call for increased spacing would be to provide it; to avoid a situation where the collapse rate on final would prohibit multiple subsequent approaches from being able to be completed. It would seem to be more efficient than working the aircraft involved twice.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.