37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 876912 |
Time | |
Date | 201003 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | FO |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B747-400 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | FMS/FMC |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer |
Experience | Flight Crew Total 3180 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Weight And Balance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Ground Event / Encounter Ground Strike - Aircraft |
Narrative:
Because the wrong take-off weight was entered into the ACARS runway analysis system (ras); the calculated thrust and speed was incorrect. 597;000lbs was entered instead of the actual take-off weight of 827;311 lbs. After entry of the wrong take-off thrust setting; the FMC calculated speed on the takeoff page was showing dashed lines (unavailable) instead of FMC calculated V speeds which usually provide the flight crew with a chance of double checking the value. The speeds on the ras print out were; instead; inserted manually. During take-off; the aircraft was rotated earlier than the vr for the actual weight; which caused ground contact after slight lift off; followed by stick shaker. We suspected encountering wind shear and performed wind shear escape maneuver with maximum thrust. During climb out; after a brief discussion; we could not preclude the possibility of a tail strike; therefore the following consideration was given: checked that all systems including pressurization were showing normal; contacted ZZZ tower to check for any sign of damage or debris on the runway; to which ZZZ later replied with 'negative'; contacted maintenance control to confirm the aircraft status; the result of which showed no abnormal readings. After we reviewed all the paper work; the wrong takeoff weight entry was identified; hence; we monitored all systems -- engine and cabin pressure readings in particular -- throughout the flight and kept close contact with the company. For the concern of safety; we selected a lower cruising altitude and performed an auto land; with a safe landing ensuing at our destination.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B747-400 flight crew took off with manually calculated V speeds; based on a TOGW 230;000 pounds less than the actual weight. A possible tail strike and failure to lift off at the lower Vr speed was overcome only by initiating the windshear escape maneuver using firewall/maximum thrust.
Narrative: Because the wrong take-off weight was entered into the ACARS Runway Analysis System (RAS); the calculated thrust and speed was incorrect. 597;000lbs was entered instead of the actual take-off weight of 827;311 lbs. After entry of the wrong take-off thrust setting; the FMC calculated speed on the takeoff page was showing dashed lines (unavailable) instead of FMC calculated V speeds which usually provide the flight crew with a chance of double checking the value. The speeds on the RAS print out were; instead; inserted manually. During take-off; the aircraft was rotated earlier than the Vr for the actual weight; which caused ground contact after slight lift off; followed by stick shaker. We suspected encountering wind shear and performed wind shear escape maneuver with MAX thrust. During climb out; after a brief discussion; we could not preclude the possibility of a tail strike; therefore the following consideration was given: Checked that all systems including pressurization were showing normal; contacted ZZZ tower to check for any sign of damage or debris on the runway; to which ZZZ later replied with 'negative'; contacted Maintenance Control to confirm the aircraft status; the result of which showed no abnormal readings. After we reviewed all the paper work; the wrong takeoff weight entry was identified; hence; we monitored all systems -- engine and cabin pressure readings in particular -- throughout the flight and kept close contact with the company. For the concern of safety; we selected a lower cruising altitude and performed an auto land; with a safe landing ensuing at our destination.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.