37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 878319 |
Time | |
Date | 201003 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | MD-83 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Route In Use | SID ZZZ |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | FMS/FMC |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
FMS equipped airplane. RNAV departure to the north. After takeoff; navigation engaged at four hundred feet with centered deviation indicator; navigation trk; and normal navigation indications. When autopilot was engaged at six hundred feet; the airplane started an immediate right turn away from the intended RNAV track. The turn was commanded on the FD also. Just as quickly; the airplane banked back to the left and intercepted the outbound track properly. There were no apparent reasons for the 'bobble' and the deviation was not significant. Winds were from the west. I do not believe that engaging the autopilot during the takeoff climb improves the accuracy of RNAV departures. The take off mode is not particularly stable and the airplane acts unpredictable using this new procedure. It is not a good answer to RNAV departure errors.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MD80 First Officer experienced minor track deviation when the auto pilot is engaged at six hundred feet during an RNAV departure. The reporter does not believe that track accuracy is improved by using the autopilot at low altitude in this aircraft.
Narrative: FMS equipped airplane. RNAV departure to the north. After takeoff; NAV engaged at four hundred feet with centered deviation indicator; NAV TRK; and normal navigation indications. When autopilot was engaged at six hundred feet; the airplane started an immediate right turn away from the intended RNAV track. The turn was commanded on the FD also. Just as quickly; the airplane banked back to the left and intercepted the outbound track properly. There were no apparent reasons for the 'bobble' and the deviation was not significant. Winds were from the west. I do not believe that engaging the autopilot during the takeoff climb improves the accuracy of RNAV departures. The take off mode is not particularly stable and the airplane acts unpredictable using this new procedure. It is not a good answer to RNAV departure errors.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.