37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 879725 |
Time | |
Date | 201002 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Technician |
Qualification | Maintenance Airframe Maintenance Powerplant |
Person 2 | |
Function | Technician |
Qualification | Maintenance Airframe Maintenance Powerplant |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
An md-80 aircraft flew into ZZZ. Dispatch had called and informed maintenance control of a possible windshear encounter in the flight. I believe engineering was left a message by a controller after the flight crew was questioned about an EPR setting of 2.14. Engineers were called back and used the dc-9 operating manual; performance -- takeoff 7; chart to analyze the reported observed 2.14 EPR and determined it was possible for a 2.14 EPR to be reached without exceeding engine speed limits. I relayed the information to a maintenance controller. No other information was given [other] than the EPR indication of 2.14 by the flight crew. At no time was I ever made aware that there was a pilot report made. If a pilot report had been entered into the flight log at ZZZ; it would have been addressed at that time.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Two Maintenance Controllers report that during their discussion with an MD-80 Captain they were unaware that he also made a Logbook entry about possible exceedances on both engines with EPR of 2.14 for 30 to 45 seconds during a windshear event. Aircraft was Released with an open Log Write-up referencing the engine parameters and possible exceedances.
Narrative: An MD-80 aircraft flew into ZZZ. Dispatch had called and informed Maintenance Control of a possible Windshear encounter in the flight. I believe Engineering was left a message by a Controller after the flight crew was questioned about an EPR setting of 2.14. Engineers were called back and used the DC-9 Operating Manual; Performance -- Takeoff 7; chart to analyze the reported observed 2.14 EPR and determined it was possible for a 2.14 EPR to be reached without exceeding engine speed limits. I relayed the information to a Maintenance Controller. No other information was given [other] than the EPR Indication of 2.14 by the flight crew. At no time was I ever made aware that there was a Pilot report made. If a Pilot report had been entered into the flight Log at ZZZ; it would have been addressed at that time.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.