37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 882009 |
Time | |
Date | 201003 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | MSP.Airport |
State Reference | MN |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Route In Use | Other Instrument Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet CL65 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Route In Use | Other Instrument Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Trainee Approach |
Person 2 | |
Function | Instructor Approach |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Msp weather: 32007 KTS 2 1/2nm -dzbr ovc 006; strong northeast winds at altitudes above 7;000. I was on OJT (on the job training) at north approach (north) doing ILS 30 left/right approaches to msp. Air carrier X was cleared for the ILS 30R approach with a speed of 170 KTS to jacko (FAF) followed by air carrier Y descending to 4;000 from 7;000 with a speed restriction of 170 KTS indicating 233 KTS. Air carrier Y was given a 280 heading to intercept the 30R localizer; instructed to cross sammz at 4;000; cleared ILS runway 30R approach maintain 170 KTS to jacko (FAF). Upon getting established on the localizer; air carrier Y's speed was still 100 KTS greater than air carrier X ahead and was issued a speed reduction to 150 KTS to jacko. Just prior to shipping the aircraft to msp; I instructed air carrier Y to reduce to final approach speed because the aircraft's speed was still 100 KTS faster than air carrier X ahead and contact msp. Per radar replay; separation was lost as air carrier Y began crossing jacko with a 90 KT overtake behind air carrier X. The msp controller on initial contact reduced air carrier Y to final approach speed and informed air carrier Y that they were 90 KTS faster than air carrier X ahead. The msp controller made a different transmission then returned to air carrier Y and canceled his approach clearance upon noticing that air carrier Y was not slowing. Air carrier Y did not respond. The msp controller had to make three transmissions to air carrier Y to cancel their approach clearance and issue missed approach instructions. Recommendation; data blocks that turn; say yellow; similar to tarp when separation may be lost if actions are not taken and then data blocks that turn red when separation is lost.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An M98 Controller receiving training experienced an over take loss of separation event with two arrival aircraft on final.
Narrative: MSP weather: 32007 KTS 2 1/2nm -DZBR OVC 006; strong northeast winds at altitudes above 7;000. I was on OJT (on the job training) at North Approach (N) doing ILS 30 L/R approaches to MSP. Air Carrier X was cleared for the ILS 30R approach with a speed of 170 KTS to JACKO (FAF) followed by Air Carrier Y descending to 4;000 from 7;000 with a speed restriction of 170 KTS indicating 233 KTS. Air Carrier Y was given a 280 heading to intercept the 30R localizer; instructed to cross SAMMZ at 4;000; cleared ILS Runway 30R approach maintain 170 KTS to JACKO (FAF). Upon getting established on the localizer; Air Carrier Y's speed was still 100 KTS greater than Air Carrier X ahead and was issued a speed reduction to 150 KTS to JACKO. Just prior to shipping the aircraft to MSP; I instructed Air Carrier Y to reduce to final approach speed because the aircraft's speed was still 100 KTS faster than Air Carrier X ahead and contact MSP. Per RADAR replay; separation was lost as Air Carrier Y began crossing JACKO with a 90 KT overtake behind Air Carrier X. The MSP Controller on initial contact reduced Air Carrier Y to final approach speed and informed Air Carrier Y that they were 90 KTS faster than Air Carrier X ahead. The MSP Controller made a different transmission then returned to Air Carrier Y and canceled his approach clearance upon noticing that Air Carrier Y was not slowing. Air Carrier Y did not respond. The MSP Controller had to make three transmissions to Air Carrier Y to cancel their approach clearance and issue missed approach instructions. Recommendation; data blocks that turn; say yellow; similar to TARP when separation may be lost if actions are not taken and then data blocks that turn red when separation is lost.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.