37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 887477 |
Time | |
Date | 201005 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.ARTCC |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Pressurization Control System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Flight Engineer |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 100 Flight Crew Total 20000 Flight Crew Type 3500 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Deviation - Procedural Maintenance |
Narrative:
At the gate I reviewed the logbook and found 2 repeat write ups; both identical. During climb pressurization flow light on. Cabin climbing outflow valve closed. During climb we experienced the same thing; the condition lasted about 30 seconds while the cabin climbed and then the light went out and the cabin went into a descent. When the cabin got back on schedule it climbed properly. We continued flight while discussing whether to continue or head back to our departure station. I called maintenance control and the gentleman I spoke with thought it would be ok to continue. We decided not to fly for 3 hours at altitude with a questionable pressurization system. The maintenance response for the 2 prior write ups was '...could not duplicate; ok for service'. Our airline is continuously placing aircraft in service without the proper troubleshooting for [proper] diagnosis. Our maintenance controllers have been trying to diagnose over the phone like a computer technician does. Two other instances prior to this example; were barely addressed.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An MD80 Captain believes his latest encounter with maintenance malfeasance--an undiagnosed pressurization problem--is symptomatic of a purposeful attempt to operate aircraft despite limited or failed maintenance diagnosis of repeated write ups.
Narrative: At the gate I reviewed the logbook and found 2 repeat write ups; both identical. During climb pressurization flow light on. Cabin climbing outflow valve closed. During climb we experienced the same thing; the condition lasted about 30 seconds while the cabin climbed and then the light went out and the cabin went into a descent. When the cabin got back on schedule it climbed properly. We continued flight while discussing whether to continue or head back to our departure station. I called Maintenance Control and the gentleman I spoke with thought it would be OK to continue. We decided not to fly for 3 hours at altitude with a questionable pressurization system. The maintenance response for the 2 prior write ups was '...could not duplicate; OK for service'. Our airline is continuously placing aircraft in service without the proper troubleshooting for [proper] diagnosis. Our Maintenance Controllers have been trying to diagnose over the phone like a computer technician does. Two other instances prior to this example; were barely addressed.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.