Narrative:

Were cleared 'visual approach' to runway 18R mco. Told to cross mco VOR at 2;500 ft. Visually crossed the VOR and by reference to tuffee felt we were past mco VOR. Passing through 2;200 ft; orlando approach said we had started down early. Here we go again. If crossing altitude over (or abeam) mco VOR while on the ILS for 18R gives you a stable approach; then perhaps have a crossing restriction when 'visual' that is 300 ft higher needs to be revisited. It is most difficult to start and maintain a stable approach from where approach control apparently feels the visual crossing point for 2;500 ft would be.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: An air carrier crew reported crossing the MCO VOR at 2;200 FT on glide slope instead of the 2;500 specified this crew believes the procedure needs to be revisited.

Narrative: Were cleared 'visual approach' to Runway 18R MCO. Told to cross MCO VOR at 2;500 FT. Visually crossed the VOR and by reference to TUFFEE felt we were past MCO VOR. Passing through 2;200 FT; Orlando Approach said we had started down early. Here we go again. If crossing altitude over (or abeam) MCO VOR while on the ILS for 18R gives you a stable approach; then perhaps have a crossing restriction when 'visual' that is 300 FT higher needs to be revisited. It is most difficult to start and maintain a stable approach from where Approach Control apparently feels the visual crossing point for 2;500 FT would be.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.