37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 922103 |
Time | |
Date | 201012 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | MGW.Airport |
State Reference | WV |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
We were flying the VOR-a to mgw for landing on runway 36. Visual with the airport was observed at 1.0 DME from mgw VOR and 2;900 MSL. At mgw 337 degrees/1.0 DME and 2;800 MSL; egpws (obstacle; pull up) warning annunciated in cockpit with a subsequent low altitude alert warning from mgw tower. There is a radio tower at 2;425 [2;409] MSL along the final approach course and it was in sight. A turn correction to the right was performed to avoid the tower. Visual with the ground was maintained from 3;000 MSL and below. VOR-a approach altitudes and final approach course were followed. No further warnings were annunciated or observed and the aircraft landed safely on runway 36.I suggest the company and/or FAA review[s] the published altitudes for this particular approach and the approach itself. There is only slightly less than a 300 ft clearance between the tower/obstacle along the final approach course and the published step down altitude (2;720 ft) (for which 2;800 ft must be entered into the altitude pre-selector). Previous GPWS warnings have occurred on this approach. Also; this is the only approach that is available for a non-circling landing on runway 36 for aircraft not equipped with GPS or RNAV.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A commercial fixed wing flight crew received an EGPWS TERRAIN and a Low Altitude Alert warning from MGW Tower while descending to cross UDDOV Intersection at 2;800 MSL on the VOR-A approach. Reporter believes the crossing altitude is in conflict with a charted 2;409 MSL obstruction (a tower) along the course from MGW VOR to UDDOV.
Narrative: We were flying the VOR-A to MGW for landing on Runway 36. Visual with the airport was observed at 1.0 DME from MGW VOR and 2;900 MSL. At MGW 337 degrees/1.0 DME and 2;800 MSL; EGPWS (obstacle; pull up) warning annunciated in cockpit with a subsequent low altitude alert warning from MGW Tower. There is a radio tower at 2;425 [2;409] MSL along the final approach course and it was in sight. A turn correction to the right was performed to avoid the tower. Visual with the ground was maintained from 3;000 MSL and below. VOR-A approach altitudes and final approach course were followed. No further warnings were annunciated or observed and the aircraft landed safely on Runway 36.I suggest the company and/or FAA review[s] the published altitudes for this particular approach and the approach itself. There is only slightly less than a 300 FT clearance between the tower/obstacle along the final approach course and the published step down altitude (2;720 FT) (for which 2;800 FT must be entered into the Altitude Pre-Selector). Previous GPWS warnings have occurred on this approach. Also; this is the only approach that is available for a non-circling landing on Runway 36 for aircraft not equipped with GPS or RNAV.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.