37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 923296 |
Time | |
Date | 201012 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | SCT.TRACON |
State Reference | CA |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | PA-46 Malibu/Malibu Mirage/Malibu Matrix |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Approach |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types |
Narrative:
A PA46 was cleared for a visual approach to gillespie field and transferred to the tower frequency. The pilot then started making a turn away from the airport; toward the traffic I had on the myf ILS final. The aircraft were about 5 miles apart when I issued traffic to the aircraft that I was working on the myf final. I called gillespie tower to insure that the pilot did not continue turning away from the airport. Traffic was not in sight; so I broke that traffic off the approach and sequenced the aircraft again. The aircraft may have gotten about 2.5 miles apart before divergence was established. Recommendation; I should have not trusted the pilot conducting the visual approach to follow procedures in the aim and fars; whereby pilots on a visual approach are to take the most expeditious route to the airport. I was not expecting the aircraft to begin a turn away from the airport. Even though the turn was slight; it was enough to cause me to take corrective action.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: SCT Controller described a visual approach event when traffic clear for approach to SEE made an unexpected turn away from the airport; creating a potential conflict with MYF traffic.
Narrative: A PA46 was cleared for a Visual Approach to Gillespie field and transferred to the Tower frequency. The pilot then started making a turn away from the airport; toward the traffic I had on the MYF ILS final. The aircraft were about 5 miles apart when I issued traffic to the aircraft that I was working on the MYF final. I called Gillespie Tower to insure that the pilot did not continue turning away from the airport. Traffic was not in sight; so I broke that traffic off the approach and sequenced the aircraft again. The aircraft may have gotten about 2.5 miles apart before divergence was established. Recommendation; I should have not trusted the pilot conducting the Visual Approach to follow procedures in the AIM and FARs; whereby pilots on a Visual Approach are to take the most expeditious route to the airport. I was not expecting the aircraft to begin a turn away from the airport. Even though the turn was slight; it was enough to cause me to take corrective action.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.