Narrative:

We departed with efb's that was not communicating with one another. I was under the impression that the efb's were still in the trial stage and didn't have to be working. I understand that the rules state that anything on the aircraft that is not in the MEL has to be working; but I seriously didn't believe that this applied here since the efb did not have to be a part of the aircraft. I didn't input the departure information during preflight because I didn't believe it to be critical.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: An Air Carrier pilot failed to program an EFB system not on MEL because he did not believe it was required since the system was in a test stage and not completely functional.

Narrative: We departed with EFB's that was not communicating with one another. I was under the impression that the EFB's were still in the trial stage and didn't have to be working. I understand that the rules state that anything on the aircraft that is not in the MEL has to be working; but I seriously didn't believe that this applied here since the EFB did not have to be a part of the aircraft. I didn't input the departure information during preflight because I didn't believe it to be critical.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.