37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 942954 |
Time | |
Date | 201104 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | NEW.Airport |
State Reference | LA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Albatros (L39) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Route In Use | Direct |
Person 1 | |
Function | Check Pilot Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 120 Flight Crew Total 16850 Flight Crew Type 1300 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Conflict NMAC |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 0 Vertical 400 |
Narrative:
Our aircraft was cleared by ATC to takeoff and assigned to maintain runway heading and 2;000 ft. Immediately after takeoff; while level at 2;000 ft; within three miles of the airport; ATC instructed an 'experimental' L-39 jet aircraft to maintain 3;000 ft and proceed to the airport. At that time; our crew had visual contact with the L-39 aircraft at our 12 o'clock and above position. Immediately thereafter; our aircraft TCAS reported the L-39 was descending from 800 ft above our assigned altitude of 2;000 ft. As the L-39 flew directly overhead our position; our TCAS issued a RA that the aircraft was descending from +800 ft through +400 ft. There was insufficient time to accomplish an evasive maneuver before the L-39 aircraft passed directly overhead and behind our position and the RA was dismissed by our TCAS. I advised ATC of the L-39's close proximity and mentioned that it was too close! I also advised ATC that our TCAS reported a RA but we were unable to react quickly enough before the alert passed and the situation was again safe. ATC reported for a second time that the L-39 was assigned to maintain 3;000 ft. When questioned by ATC; I heard the L-39 pilot advise the controller that he had descended to remain clear of the cloud base along the L-39's ATC assigned routing. The remainder of the flight was uneventful.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A corporate jet Captain reported an NMAC with an L-39 shortly after takeoff from NEW when the L-39 descended below his cleared altitude to avoid a cloud base.
Narrative: Our aircraft was cleared by ATC to takeoff and assigned to maintain runway heading and 2;000 FT. Immediately after takeoff; while level at 2;000 FT; within three miles of the airport; ATC instructed an 'experimental' L-39 jet aircraft to maintain 3;000 FT and proceed to the airport. At that time; our crew had visual contact with the L-39 aircraft at our 12 o'clock and above position. Immediately thereafter; our aircraft TCAS reported the L-39 was descending from 800 FT above our assigned altitude of 2;000 FT. As the L-39 flew directly overhead our position; our TCAS issued a RA that the aircraft was descending from +800 FT through +400 FT. There was insufficient time to accomplish an evasive maneuver before the L-39 aircraft passed directly overhead and behind our position and the RA was dismissed by our TCAS. I advised ATC of the L-39's close proximity and mentioned that it was too close! I also advised ATC that our TCAS reported a RA but we were unable to react quickly enough before the alert passed and the situation was again safe. ATC reported for a second time that the L-39 was assigned to maintain 3;000 FT. When questioned by ATC; I heard the L-39 pilot advise the Controller that he had descended to remain clear of the cloud base along the L-39's ATC assigned routing. The remainder of the flight was uneventful.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.