Narrative:

Early morning at approximately xa:30 am; I was contacted by maintenance mechanic X; working the overnight maintenance at the line; of wear/tear found on the forward cargo bay door seal of a crj-700 aircraft. The mechanic inquired as to; if we could defer the damaged seal as per non-essential function (nef) 25-700-13 category-3 (CAT) 'cargo door seal' with remarks/exceptions stating: 'may be worn or torn' and no maintenance procedure was required. He said that the part was in stock; but would take several hours to install and the aircraft was due out at xb:00 am. I told the mechanic I was going to put him on hold while I conferred with the other maintenance controller present. The other maintenance controller and I reviewed the nef and determined that the seal would be covered by the nef. I then instructed the mechanic to defer the seal on nef and gave him the control number and correct date. I entered the part number the mechanic gave me into [the maintenance] computer and closed out the discrepancy once the paperwork was received. The mechanic also said that the maintenance trainers and hangar supervisors all agreed that the nef was legal; based on the way the nef is written. The FAA; while doing their routine inspections; found the damaged seal on nef [deferral]; and though the nef does not specify the type seal that can be deferred; they [FAA] determined the door pressure seal was not covered. The event occurred because the nef was not specific to the type cargo door seal that could be deferred [under nef]. I was informed that the FAA found the item [deferred] on nef and they said that it does not pertain to the forward cargo door pressure seal. The aircraft was subsequently grounded and the discrepancy corrected with a delay of 3 hours. The nef '25-700-13 CAT-3 'cargo door seal' with remarks/exceptions stating 'may be worn or torn' and 'no maintenance procedure was required' is too vague and should be revised to specify the type seal that is covered; or remove the nef chapter 25-700-13 [reference] altogether.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A Maintenance Controller reports a CRJ-700 Forward Cargo Door pressure seal was deferred under a Non-Essential Function (NEF) Chapter 25-700-13 and released. While doing a routine inspection; the FAA determined the damaged cargo door pressure seal was not covered under the NEF category. The aircraft was grounded for repairs.

Narrative: Early morning at approximately XA:30 AM; I was contacted by Maintenance Mechanic X; working the overnight maintenance at the line; of wear/tear found on the forward cargo bay door seal of a CRJ-700 aircraft. The Mechanic inquired as to; if we could defer the damaged seal as per Non-Essential Function (NEF) 25-700-13 CATEGORY-3 (CAT) 'Cargo Door Seal' with remarks/exceptions stating: 'May be worn or torn' and no Maintenance Procedure was required. He said that the part was in stock; but would take several hours to install and the aircraft was due out at XB:00 AM. I told the Mechanic I was going to put him on hold while I conferred with the other Maintenance Controller present. The other Maintenance Controller and I reviewed the NEF and determined that the seal would be covered by the NEF. I then instructed the Mechanic to defer the seal on NEF and gave him the Control Number and correct date. I entered the part number the Mechanic gave me into [the maintenance] computer and closed out the discrepancy once the paperwork was received. The Mechanic also said that the Maintenance Trainers and Hangar Supervisors all agreed that the NEF was legal; based on the way the NEF is written. The FAA; while doing their Routine Inspections; found the damaged seal on NEF [deferral]; and though the NEF does not specify the type seal that can be deferred; they [FAA] determined the door pressure seal was not covered. The event occurred because the NEF was not specific to the type cargo door seal that could be deferred [under NEF]. I was informed that the FAA found the item [deferred] on NEF and they said that it does not pertain to the Forward Cargo Door pressure seal. The aircraft was subsequently grounded and the discrepancy corrected with a delay of 3 hours. The NEF '25-700-13 CAT-3 'Cargo Door Seal' with remarks/exceptions stating 'May be worn or torn' and 'no Maintenance Procedure was required' is too vague and should be revised to specify the type seal that is covered; or remove the NEF Chapter 25-700-13 [reference] altogether.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.