37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 95075 |
Time | |
Date | 198809 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : lvm |
State Reference | MT |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 11000 msl bound upper : 11000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zlc |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | cruise other other |
Route In Use | enroute airway : zlc |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : radar |
Qualification | controller : radar |
ASRS Report | 95075 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : flight data |
ASRS Report | 95074 |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : investigated |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Deviation |
Narrative:
I relieved a controller on the btm sector. A GA aircraft Y cancelled IFR and the data block of GA X was in the area. I inadvertently removed strips on X instead of Y . The aircraft crossed the sector boundary west/O coordination which was declared a system deviation. Aircraft X called sector 19 (gtf) and requested to cancel his IFR. The controller checked sectors around him until he found out where the aircraft came from before it entered sector 19. The supervisor was informed and the investigation was started. No evasive action was taken. By aircraft X and no other aircraft were involved. I believe the situation occurred because the wrong data block was removed from the system. More attention be given to data blocks and do not remove strips. Supplemental information from acn 95074: I was working the d-side of btm sector. Aircraft X was not on the scope, but aircraft Y that had cancelled IFR at bzn, was in coast track so I removed the data block assigned to that aircraft. The r-man was busy and I had appreq'ed the aircraft in question wrong altitude for direction of flight and the aircraft was in radar the last I saw, so I removed the strip from the sector.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: IFR ACFT PROCEEDED FROM ONE ARTCC SECTOR SECTOR INTO ADJACENT SECTOR WITHOUT COORD, POINTOUT OR HANDOFF BECAUSE TARGET HAD BEEN MISTAKENLY DROPPED. OPERATIONAL DEVIATION.
Narrative: I RELIEVED A CTLR ON THE BTM SECTOR. A GA ACFT Y CANCELLED IFR AND THE DATA BLOCK OF GA X WAS IN THE AREA. I INADVERTENTLY REMOVED STRIPS ON X INSTEAD OF Y . THE ACFT CROSSED THE SECTOR BOUNDARY W/O COORD WHICH WAS DECLARED A SYS DEVIATION. ACFT X CALLED SECTOR 19 (GTF) AND REQUESTED TO CANCEL HIS IFR. THE CTLR CHKED SECTORS AROUND HIM UNTIL HE FOUND OUT WHERE THE ACFT CAME FROM BEFORE IT ENTERED SECTOR 19. THE SUPVR WAS INFORMED AND THE INVESTIGATION WAS STARTED. NO EVASIVE ACTION WAS TAKEN. BY ACFT X AND NO OTHER ACFT WERE INVOLVED. I BELIEVE THE SITUATION OCCURRED BECAUSE THE WRONG DATA BLOCK WAS REMOVED FROM THE SYS. MORE ATTN BE GIVEN TO DATA BLOCKS AND DO NOT REMOVE STRIPS. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 95074: I WAS WORKING THE D-SIDE OF BTM SECTOR. ACFT X WAS NOT ON THE SCOPE, BUT ACFT Y THAT HAD CANCELLED IFR AT BZN, WAS IN COAST TRACK SO I REMOVED THE DATA BLOCK ASSIGNED TO THAT ACFT. THE R-MAN WAS BUSY AND I HAD APPREQ'ED THE ACFT IN QUESTION WRONG ALT FOR DIRECTION OF FLT AND THE ACFT WAS IN RADAR THE LAST I SAW, SO I REMOVED THE STRIP FROM THE SECTOR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.