![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 952560 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201106 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.ARTCC |
| State Reference | US |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | A319 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | Cruise |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Enroute |
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Enroute |
| Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types |
Narrative:
I was working the d-side immediately after a session on the r-side where we came out of darc. An A319 entered sector X's airspace at FL370 around the time where we were transitioning back to host from darc. We don't believe a flight plan was entered into the computer by that sector; but had found a hand written sheet with its flight information. When the A319 was within the eastern 15 miles of our sector; the data block of a second air carrier acquired on its track and the neighboring ARTCC immediately took the hand off. We saw the swap take place; as the data block jumped approximately 70 miles. After asking the second air carrier to identify; we confirmed the flight was just east of the VOR. I went through our strips and did not find a strip on the A319; so I called the originating ARTCC and asked them to look up the code; they still had it in their system; and they passed flight information. We believe that the A319 was never on our frequency. I was able to reach the A319 on guard and confirmed with an identify that the flight was in fact the same code that the other air carrier had tracked-up on. Recommendation; I believe that the fatigue of the midnight shift and complications with the transition from darc to host contributed to this situation. I am not sure what caused the data blocks to swap or acquire at such a far distance; I have never seen anything like that.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Enroute Controller described a very busy/complex traffic period during the transition from DARC to HOST that resulted in an unexpected data block jump/swap that confused all involved.
Narrative: I was working the D-Side immediately after a session on the R-Side where we came out of DARC. An A319 entered Sector X's airspace at FL370 around the time where we were transitioning back to HOST from DARC. We don't believe a flight plan was entered into the computer by that sector; but had found a hand written sheet with its flight information. When the A319 was within the eastern 15 miles of our sector; the Data Block of a second Air Carrier acquired on its track and the neighboring ARTCC immediately took the hand off. We saw the swap take place; as the data block jumped approximately 70 miles. After asking the second Air Carrier to IDENT; we confirmed the flight was just east of the VOR. I went through our strips and did not find a strip on the A319; so I called the originating ARTCC and asked them to look up the code; they still had it in their system; and they passed flight information. We believe that the A319 was never on our frequency. I was able to reach the A319 on guard and confirmed with an IDENT that the flight was in fact the same code that the other Air Carrier had tracked-up on. Recommendation; I believe that the fatigue of the midnight shift and complications with the transition from DARC to HOST contributed to this situation. I am not sure what caused the data blocks to swap or acquire at such a far distance; I have never seen anything like that.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.