37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 967055 |
Time | |
Date | 201108 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | PHL.TRACON |
State Reference | PA |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Pitot-Static System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
On short final approach we received an ECAM 'capt tat' message during flight through bands of heavy rain. We continued and completed the landing with normal indications. Once on the ground the ECAM disappeared. I contacted maintenance control and wrote it up in the logbook. One theory of a recent overwater high altitude accident is that the tat probe filled with water while flying through a thunderstorm and iced up; negatively impacting pitot/static systems. The heavy rain we encountered prior to landing may have done the same since we had a strong 30 KTS cross wind coming from the captain's side; potentially filling the tat probe with water. We were not at altitude so there was no icing potential. We experienced no obvious difference in air speed or altitude indication. I believe the aircraft manufacturer; the NTSB; the FAA; maintenance and our company need to address this issue.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An A320 flight crew received an ECAM Capt TAT warning on short final in heavy rains. They made a safe landing after which the message disappeared. Maintenance was advised.
Narrative: On short final approach we received an ECAM 'Capt TAT' message during flight through bands of heavy rain. We continued and completed the landing with normal indications. Once on the ground the ECAM disappeared. I contacted Maintenance Control and wrote it up in the logbook. One theory of a recent overwater high altitude accident is that the TAT probe filled with water while flying through a thunderstorm and iced up; negatively impacting pitot/static systems. The heavy rain we encountered prior to landing may have done the same since we had a strong 30 KTS cross wind coming from the Captain's side; potentially filling the TAT probe with water. We were not at altitude so there was no icing potential. We experienced no obvious difference in air speed or altitude indication. I believe the aircraft manufacturer; the NTSB; the FAA; Maintenance and our company need to address this issue.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.