37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 967205 |
Time | |
Date | 201108 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Pitot-Static System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 257 Flight Crew Total 14323 Flight Crew Type 4232 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Aircraft was taxied to the gate at xa:40am local time by mechanics for an xb:29am departure. Crew boarded and began the normal set-up. Captain performed walk-around. On walk-around captain noticed both forward static ports had streaked and running red paint from the circular border as well as the lettering. From aircraft knowledge; as well as the label on the [static port] area; captain knew areas were supposed to be clean and smooth. The running paint seemed to violate this protocol. A rivet head was also noticed missing from the number one engine cowl. Per aircraft flight manual procedures; both items were entered into ACARS and sent to maintenance control for action. Local maintenance was notified via radio. Local company mechanic was observed to pull a stand to the left side of aircraft and clean the static port area. He then returned the stand to it's area. Since both sides [of the aircraft] were affected; the captain went to the ramp [office] to inform the mechanic that perhaps he had misread the write-up. The mechanic then stated the write-ups were nonsense anyhow; (he used the longer form of nonsense; but I understand some mechanics are very sensitive to swear words so I won't repeat--although I hate to leave out facts). I politely informed him that our procedures require a write-up of discrepancies (which of course he knows) but he said any write-up this close to departure makes them look bad. Since they brought the plane to the gate; any earlier write-ups were of course impossible. I am not sure if they were embarrassed they missed them; but all the mechanics in the office heard the conversation and no one corrected him. I assume the mechanic had the option to sign-off the write-ups as fraudulent; or unable to find; but instead he cleaned the areas and deferred the missing rivet; thus validating my concerns. I am once again amazed at the attitude of a professional company mechanic. His opinion was that I should not enter very valid write-ups as to make the station look good. In the future they will find me just as uncooperative in this regard; as I prefer safety over style points.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An A320 Captain reported the poor attitude of a company Line Mechanic after writing up paint on the forward static ports and a missing rivet on the #1 engine cowl; having to insist proper corrective action be taken.
Narrative: Aircraft was taxied to the gate at XA:40am local time by mechanics for an XB:29am departure. Crew boarded and began the normal set-up. Captain performed walk-around. On walk-around Captain noticed both forward static ports had streaked and running red paint from the circular border as well as the lettering. From aircraft knowledge; as well as the label on the [Static Port] area; Captain knew areas were supposed to be clean and smooth. The running paint seemed to violate this protocol. A rivet head was also noticed missing from the number one engine cowl. Per Aircraft Flight Manual procedures; both items were entered into ACARS and sent to Maintenance Control for action. Local maintenance was notified via radio. Local company Mechanic was observed to pull a stand to the left side of aircraft and clean the static port area. He then returned the stand to it's area. Since both sides [of the aircraft] were affected; the Captain went to the ramp [office] to inform the Mechanic that perhaps he had misread the write-up. The Mechanic then stated the write-ups were nonsense anyhow; (he used the longer form of nonsense; but I understand some mechanics are very sensitive to swear words so I won't repeat--although I hate to leave out facts). I politely informed him that our procedures require a write-up of discrepancies (which of course he knows) but he said any write-up this close to departure makes them look bad. Since they brought the plane to the gate; any earlier write-ups were of course impossible. I am not sure if they were embarrassed they missed them; but all the mechanics in the office heard the conversation and no one corrected him. I assume the Mechanic had the option to sign-off the write-ups as fraudulent; or unable to find; but instead he cleaned the areas and deferred the missing rivet; thus validating my concerns. I am once again amazed at the attitude of a professional company Mechanic. His opinion was that I should not enter very valid write-ups as to make the station look good. In the future they will find me just as uncooperative in this regard; as I prefer safety over style points.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.