37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1000948 |
Time | |
Date | 201203 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | SFO.Airport |
State Reference | CA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-700 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Flap Control (Trailing & Leading Edge) |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying First Officer |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 319 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 198 Flight Crew Type 21023 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
During configuration to land at sfo on the FMS qb 28R; we were distracted with visual point out of another carrier's flight landing on 28L approximately 5 NM at our 10 o'clock position. We saw the other carrier as I was calling for flap changes and gear inside of archi around 15 NM between 6;000 ft and 2;000 ft. I did not verify the flaps were moving on the indicator until 2;000 ft cleared to land by sfo tower. I noticed they were indicating up with a slight split while the handle was at flaps 30. I executed a go-around; we ran the checklist for no flap less than 1; and used alternate leading edge extension which worked as advertised. Captain landed on 28R uneventful at gross weight of 113; at 167 ref; autobrakes 2 used until <80 KTS. All paperwork filed with company.flaps did not program from up position when handle was moved from up detent. Slight split showing on flap indicator between zero and flap position 1. I should have verified each flap setting as I called for it. Maintain aircraft control first. I will do diligence in the future. Although we were distracted by ATC and a flight that was being vectored in close proximity for a visual to 28L; that is no excuse.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737-700 flight crew reports being distracted by traffic approaching a parallel runway and not noticing that the flaps are jammed although the flap handle had been selected to 30 degrees. A go-around was initiated and QRH procedures complied with; resulting in a zero flap and full leading edge device landing.
Narrative: During configuration to land at SFO on the FMS QB 28R; we were distracted with visual point out of another carrier's flight landing on 28L approximately 5 NM at our 10 o'clock position. We saw the other carrier as I was calling for flap changes and gear inside of ARCHI around 15 NM between 6;000 FT and 2;000 FT. I did not verify the flaps were moving on the indicator until 2;000 FT cleared to land by SFO Tower. I noticed they were indicating up with a slight split while the handle was at flaps 30. I executed a go-around; we ran the checklist for no flap less than 1; and used alternate leading edge extension which worked as advertised. Captain landed on 28R uneventful at gross weight of 113; at 167 Ref; autobrakes 2 used until <80 KTS. All paperwork filed with company.Flaps did not program from up position when handle was moved from up detent. Slight split showing on flap indicator between zero and flap position 1. I should have verified each flap setting as I called for it. Maintain aircraft control first. I will do diligence in the future. Although we were distracted by ATC and a flight that was being vectored in close proximity for a visual to 28L; that is no excuse.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.