37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1004550 |
Time | |
Date | 201204 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ABQ.Airport |
State Reference | NM |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A319 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 90 Flight Crew Total 8500 Flight Crew Type 1250 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
Prior to descent captain briefed ILS runway 8 abq and a visual to runway 21 just in case per ATIS. During descent we got a new ATIS showing only a visual approach to runway 26 because of the strong winds 250/20. The captain rebriefed and reloaded the box with a cf of 1;500 AGL 5 miles out. Approach cleared us the visual to runway 26. We crossed miera at 15;000 ft. The captain slowed and configured early. We monitored the radar altitude and descent profile. We were going through 9;200 ft with a radar altitude of 1;700 ft AGL when tower called and asked about turbulence. Immediately after I responded tower called minimum vectoring altitude is 9;200 ft. We were at 9;000 ft. Seconds later we got an egpws warning captain immediately executed the escape maneuver. I looked at our radar altimeter and saw we were climbing and called out 1;500 ft climbing. Captain returned to a stabilized approach and completed the visual approach to runway 26. Recommend a visual approach procedure for abq runway 26/runway 21 with radial/DME altitude constraints. We talked about asking control to vector us to a 5 NM final for terrain clearance and we should have done that. Also have a minimum vectoring alt chart for abq. I would not recommend a visual to runway 26 or runway 21 at night.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A319 First Officer describes a night visual approach to Runway 26 at ABQ that results in an ATC low altitude alert followed quickly by an EGPWS terrain warning. The escape maneuver is initiated until clear then the visual approach is continued to landing. Reporter recommends against night visual approaches to Runway 26.
Narrative: Prior to descent Captain briefed ILS Runway 8 ABQ and a visual to Runway 21 just in case per ATIS. During descent we got a new ATIS showing only a visual approach to Runway 26 because of the strong winds 250/20. The Captain rebriefed and reloaded the box with a CF of 1;500 AGL 5 miles out. Approach cleared us the visual to Runway 26. We crossed MIERA at 15;000 FT. The Captain slowed and configured early. We monitored the radar altitude and descent profile. We were going through 9;200 FT with a radar altitude of 1;700 FT AGL when Tower called and asked about turbulence. Immediately after I responded Tower called minimum vectoring altitude is 9;200 FT. We were at 9;000 FT. Seconds later we got an EGPWS warning Captain immediately executed the escape maneuver. I looked at our radar altimeter and saw we were climbing and called out 1;500 FT climbing. Captain returned to a stabilized approach and completed the visual approach to Runway 26. Recommend a visual approach procedure for ABQ Runway 26/Runway 21 with radial/DME altitude constraints. We talked about asking control to vector us to a 5 NM final for terrain clearance and we should have done that. Also have a minimum vectoring alt chart for ABQ. I would not recommend a visual to Runway 26 or Runway 21 at night.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.