37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1005131 |
Time | |
Date | 201204 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ATL.Airport |
State Reference | GA |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | B767-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Approach Departure |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
I was working a parallel monitor position. A B737 was the lead aircraft; a B767 the trailing aircraft. The B737 slowed more than expected at the FAF. I instructed the B767 to slow to final approach speed; and he did. Two point five miles was required; and it went down to 2.36 at the time the B737 was over the approach end. The rate of compression had reduced; and I made a conscience decision to allow the B767 to continue the approach. Spacing was sufficient for the tower; and there was no danger of a go-around due to long roll out of the lead aircraft with current conditions. There was no reduction in safety; and no danger to the users. Local control 1 had made the transfer control point (tcp) 1 mile; but a few airplanes later went to 3 miles; which would have made the operation legal. I honestly don't know; with the new confusing quality control order; if we still have an approach end; or if this is simply a mandatory occurrence report (mor) now.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A80 Controller described a less than required arrival spacing event but elected not to issue a go around.
Narrative: I was working a Parallel Monitor Position. A B737 was the lead aircraft; a B767 the trailing aircraft. The B737 slowed more than expected at the FAF. I instructed the B767 to slow to final approach speed; and he did. Two point five miles was required; and it went down to 2.36 at the time the B737 was over the approach end. The rate of compression had reduced; and I made a conscience decision to allow the B767 to continue the approach. Spacing was sufficient for the Tower; and there was no danger of a go-around due to long roll out of the lead aircraft with current conditions. There was no reduction in safety; and no danger to the users. Local Control 1 had made the Transfer Control Point (TCP) 1 mile; but a few airplanes later went to 3 miles; which would have made the operation legal. I honestly don't know; with the new confusing Quality Control order; if we still have an approach end; or if this is simply a Mandatory Occurrence Report (MOR) now.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.