37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1012895 |
Time | |
Date | 201205 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ORD.Airport |
State Reference | IL |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 140 ER/LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types |
Narrative:
[We had an] ATC loss of separation during approach to 4R ord. [We were] instructed by ATC to discontinue the approach and fly heading 250. Instructions [were] given by male voice; not original female voice of approach controller. Crew asked for clarification on direction of turn twice and received no response. Initiated a right turn to heading published on 4R approach chart. [We were] questioned by ATC male voice as to current heading and direction of turn. Told by ATC male voice that the turn was to be to the left and to fly new heading of 180. [We were] then instructed by ATC female voice to fly 250 heading. ATC male voice then questioned new heading and crew responded 250. Confusion arose from two different ATC controllers issuing different instructions and ATC failure to respond to crew queries in a timely manner. [We were] vectored back for another approach/landing 4R.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An Air Carrier on approach to ORD Runway 4R was issued a go around after receiving several conflicting headings. The reporter suspects training may have been a factor.
Narrative: [We had an] ATC loss of separation during approach to 4R ORD. [We were] instructed by ATC to discontinue the approach and fly heading 250. Instructions [were] given by male voice; not original female voice of Approach Controller. Crew asked for clarification on direction of turn twice and received no response. Initiated a right turn to heading published on 4R approach chart. [We were] questioned by ATC male voice as to current heading and direction of turn. Told by ATC male voice that the turn was to be to the left and to fly new heading of 180. [We were] then instructed by ATC female voice to fly 250 heading. ATC male voice then questioned new heading and crew responded 250. Confusion arose from two different ATC controllers issuing different instructions and ATC failure to respond to crew queries in a timely manner. [We were] vectored back for another approach/landing 4R.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.