37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 102011 |
Time | |
Date | 198901 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : hnl |
State Reference | HI |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Widebody, Low Wing, 3 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Route In Use | enroute : pacific enroute airway : zoa |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Widebody, Low Wing, 3 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Route In Use | enroute : pacific |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : second officer |
Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 3400 flight time type : 70 |
ASRS Report | 102011 |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
On 2 successive days of flying between los angeles and honolulu, we experienced 2 potentially confusing situations with call signs and SELCAL identifiers. I must emphasize that ATC recognized these potential problems and handled them beautifully, but I feel that both situations are easily correctable and should be fixed before a real problem arises. First, on both 1/sat/89 and 1/sun/89, our aircraft flts ca heavy and ax heavy, respectively, ax heavy had the identical SELCAL identifier (XXXX) as air carrier B flying the same route at the same time. Second, on 1/sun/89, we departed honolulu as air carrier a ax heavy at the same time as air carrier C ax heavy, flying transpacific at the same time. I believe a little coordination between the various carriers would eliminate these potential safety problems.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: SIMILAR AND SAME A/N IN SAME AREA. TWO ACFT WITH SAME SELCAL DESIGNATOR.
Narrative: ON 2 SUCCESSIVE DAYS OF FLYING BTWN LOS ANGELES AND HONOLULU, WE EXPERIENCED 2 POTENTIALLY CONFUSING SITUATIONS WITH CALL SIGNS AND SELCAL IDENTIFIERS. I MUST EMPHASIZE THAT ATC RECOGNIZED THESE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS AND HANDLED THEM BEAUTIFULLY, BUT I FEEL THAT BOTH SITUATIONS ARE EASILY CORRECTABLE AND SHOULD BE FIXED BEFORE A REAL PROBLEM ARISES. FIRST, ON BOTH 1/SAT/89 AND 1/SUN/89, OUR ACFT FLTS CA HEAVY AND AX HEAVY, RESPECTIVELY, AX HEAVY HAD THE IDENTICAL SELCAL IDENTIFIER (XXXX) AS ACR B FLYING THE SAME ROUTE AT THE SAME TIME. SECOND, ON 1/SUN/89, WE DEPARTED HONOLULU AS ACR A AX HEAVY AT THE SAME TIME AS ACR C AX HEAVY, FLYING TRANSPACIFIC AT THE SAME TIME. I BELIEVE A LITTLE COORD BETWEEN THE VARIOUS CARRIERS WOULD ELIMINATE THESE POTENTIAL SAFETY PROBLEMS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.