Narrative:

During normal descent for landing on RNAV GPS approach a landing gear malfunction occurred. A missed approach was declared with request direct to published hold. While in the hold the gear extension checklist was run three times without any change in the unsafe indication. ATC did not call back at the efc so we contacted them for a visual approach to the runway for a gear examination by ATC and maintenance. En route to the airport we declared an emergency [due to a] landing gear problem. ATC queried as to souls onboard and intentions. Proceeding to the inspection point; the final emergency landing gear extension checklist was completed. Due to the airspeed restriction of 90 knots and the unusual flight control inputs 'yaw' specified [by the checklist] the autopilot and alt hold [were] disconnected and a loss of altitude [occurred and] was uncorrected for 30 seconds. The alert ATC controller requested correction which we could not perform immediately due to the slow airspeed and aircraft configuration: gear down; flaps down; airspeed less than 90 knots. A slow climb back to altitude was commenced. While climbing; the tower controller requested lower altitude for gear inspection and the climb was stopped and a descent was initiated. Given the circumstances and the configuration and airspeed restriction some loss of altitude would occur. In order to not have a loss of altitude; a more serious condition of decaying airspeed with a possible stall loss of control in close proximity to ground might arise. A loss of 200 feet did not seem to be an unreasonable expectation given the emergency.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: While troubleshooting a gear extension problem on a PA-46; the pilot lost 200 feet of altitude. This was pointed out by ATC and the pilot corrected for it.

Narrative: During normal descent for landing on RNAV GPS approach a landing gear malfunction occurred. A missed approach was declared with request direct to published hold. While in the hold the gear extension checklist was run three times without any change in the unsafe indication. ATC did not call back at the EFC so we contacted them for a visual approach to the runway for a gear examination by ATC and Maintenance. En route to the airport we declared an emergency [due to a] landing gear problem. ATC queried as to souls onboard and intentions. Proceeding to the inspection point; the final emergency landing gear extension checklist was completed. Due to the airspeed restriction of 90 knots and the unusual flight control inputs 'yaw' specified [by the checklist] the autopilot and alt hold [were] disconnected and a loss of altitude [occurred and] was uncorrected for 30 seconds. The alert ATC Controller requested correction which we could not perform immediately due to the slow airspeed and aircraft configuration: gear down; flaps down; airspeed less than 90 knots. A slow climb back to altitude was commenced. While climbing; the Tower Controller requested lower altitude for gear inspection and the climb was stopped and a descent was initiated. Given the circumstances and the configuration and airspeed restriction some loss of altitude would occur. In order to not have a loss of altitude; a more serious condition of decaying airspeed with a possible stall loss of control in close proximity to ground might arise. A loss of 200 feet did not seem to be an unreasonable expectation given the emergency.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.