37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1037171 |
Time | |
Date | 201206 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | PA-44 Seminole/Turbo Seminole |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Function | Instructor Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 267.8 Flight Crew Total 966.7 Flight Crew Type 140.3 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Ground Event / Encounter Object Ground Excursion Runway Inflight Event / Encounter Loss Of Aircraft Control |
Narrative:
During a multi engine training flight; I simulated an engine failure on the takeoff roll by retarding the right mixture to idle/cutoff after the student had applied takeoff power (as I had been trained to do in my mei training). The student failed to recover properly from the simulation and would not release the controls after I instructed him to do so. I quickly retarded the left mixture to idle/cutoff; but the aircraft was already exiting the runway onto the grass; destroying a runway light. I had given the student ground instruction on multi-engine aerodynamics; and we had discussed what to do in the event of engine failures; both on the ground and in flight. The student was using a checklist and had read aloud the proper procedures for recovering from an engine failure during the takeoff roll; and we had discussed it prior to the starting the engines and again prior to taking the runway. I learned that simulating an engine failure on the takeoff roll during the first flight is not the safest way to conduct flight training and that I should be more alert for students to improperly correct for adverse situations in order to conduct safer flight training. The airplane was mildly damaged; only propeller blades that needed replaced or filed down and re-balanced; and the aircraft was operational again within several days.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PA-44-180 instructor reported the aircraft departed the runway; causing minor damage; when power was cut to simulate an engine failure.
Narrative: During a multi engine training flight; I simulated an engine failure on the takeoff roll by retarding the right mixture to Idle/Cutoff after the student had applied takeoff power (as I had been trained to do in my MEI training). The student failed to recover properly from the simulation and would not release the controls after I instructed him to do so. I quickly retarded the left mixture to Idle/Cutoff; but the aircraft was already exiting the runway onto the grass; destroying a runway light. I had given the student ground instruction on multi-engine aerodynamics; and we had discussed what to do in the event of engine failures; both on the ground and in flight. The student was using a checklist and had read aloud the proper procedures for recovering from an engine failure during the takeoff roll; and we had discussed it prior to the starting the engines and again prior to taking the runway. I learned that simulating an engine failure on the takeoff roll during the first flight is not the safest way to conduct flight training and that I should be more alert for students to improperly correct for adverse situations in order to conduct safer flight training. The airplane was mildly damaged; only propeller blades that needed replaced or filed down and re-balanced; and the aircraft was operational again within several days.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.