37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1040952 |
Time | |
Date | 201210 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER/LR (CRJ200) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Bonanza 36 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Approach Departure |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict NMAC Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
I was training on the final sector; the developmental on position was working their first position after skill enhancement training (set) for this sector. Set was assigned to the trainee to work on scan; projecting; working speed; and control judgment. This was a very complex session for anyone; but especially for a trainee struggling with training as this one is. We were working a flight check (flight crew) aircraft; foreign and local fighters; and regular air carrier traffic. Weather was VFR; visual approaches to runways 10L/right. There are several incidents that took place during this session; one which involved a loss of separation. Within the first 10 minutes on position; my trainee descended a flight of 2 F16s from 5;000 ft into non-radar airspace for a conflicting departure protected to 4;000 ft [and into a] bonanza which I had to correct and issue a climb. Flight crew aircraft was running tests for the runway 10R localizer at 1;500 ft; and had conflicting VFR traffic which my trainee called several times and then had to issue a safety alert and suggest a turn. I was informed by management the VFR traffic later called the facility to report a near midair collision with 'a regional jet 25 feet away;' which was probably the flight crew aircraft; a learjet. The loss of separation involved the bonanza; a point-out from another sector northwest bound through my airspace at 4;000 ft. We had a crj-200; on downwind vectors roughly heading 280 and 5;000 ft. My trainee was struggling with keeping up with the traffic; and left the crj-200 on extended downwind. When they finally based the traffic to a heading of 010; I was so concerned with the sequence that I missed the altitude assignment. I was concerned with putting another aircraft inside of crj-200 since the vectors were so late. I didn't even notice the crj-200 and bonanza conflict; and was informed of the possible and then confirmed loss of separation. The crj-200 ended up descending into the bonanza as they were turning through their flight track; closest proximity approximately 2.8 miles and 600 ft. Separation was lost for 3 radar sweeps. Contributing factors to this event were added workload form foreign fighters; the trainee's lack of confidence on position due to recent struggles in training; flight check activity; traffic volume; sector complexity (conflict with satellite airport); and my fatigue. I realized that while I felt fine working sectors on my own; but I was having trouble concentrating while conducting ojti. [I need] to recognize my signs of fatigue and be more aware of when I'm having difficulty concentrating. Bravo airspace around the airport would have limited the VFR aircraft's activity in the airport and not caused the traffic alert situation and apparent near midair collision. The training team should also not have been put in the position of training a struggling trainee on a very complex and busy session. The south feeder is also recently certified and was having a very hard time keeping up with this session; and that added to a frantic atmosphere in the TRACON that affected the performance of the trainee.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: TRACON Controller described a conflict event when his Developmental was overwhelmed with complex traffic especially for a student experiencing difficulties.
Narrative: I was training on the Final Sector; the Developmental on position was working their first position after Skill Enhancement Training (SET) for this sector. SET was assigned to the Trainee to work on scan; projecting; working speed; and control judgment. This was a very complex session for anyone; but especially for a trainee struggling with training as this one is. We were working a Flight Check (FLC) aircraft; foreign and local fighters; and regular air carrier traffic. Weather was VFR; visual approaches to Runways 10L/R. There are several incidents that took place during this session; one which involved a loss of separation. Within the first 10 minutes on position; my trainee descended a flight of 2 F16s from 5;000 FT into non-RADAR airspace for a conflicting departure protected to 4;000 FT [and into a] Bonanza which I had to correct and issue a climb. FLC aircraft was running tests for the Runway 10R localizer at 1;500 FT; and had conflicting VFR traffic which my Trainee called several times and then had to issue a safety alert and suggest a turn. I was informed by Management the VFR traffic later called the facility to report a NMAC with 'a regional jet 25 feet away;' which was probably the FLC aircraft; a Learjet. The loss of separation involved the Bonanza; a point-out from another sector northwest bound through my airspace at 4;000 FT. We had a CRJ-200; on downwind vectors roughly heading 280 and 5;000 FT. My Trainee was struggling with keeping up with the traffic; and left the CRJ-200 on extended downwind. When they finally based the traffic to a heading of 010; I was so concerned with the sequence that I missed the altitude assignment. I was concerned with putting another aircraft inside of CRJ-200 since the vectors were so late. I didn't even notice the CRJ-200 and Bonanza conflict; and was informed of the possible and then confirmed loss of separation. The CRJ-200 ended up descending into the Bonanza as they were turning through their flight track; closest proximity approximately 2.8 miles and 600 FT. Separation was lost for 3 RADAR sweeps. Contributing factors to this event were added workload form foreign fighters; the trainee's lack of confidence on position due to recent struggles in training; flight check activity; traffic volume; sector complexity (conflict with satellite airport); and my fatigue. I realized that while I felt fine working sectors on my own; but I was having trouble concentrating while conducting OJTI. [I need] to recognize my signs of fatigue and be more aware of when I'm having difficulty concentrating. Bravo airspace around the airport would have limited the VFR aircraft's activity in the airport and not caused the traffic alert situation and apparent NMAC. The training team should also not have been put in the position of training a struggling trainee on a very complex and busy session. The South Feeder is also recently certified and was having a very hard time keeping up with this session; and that added to a frantic atmosphere in the TRACON that affected the performance of the Trainee.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.