37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1056264 |
Time | |
Date | 201212 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | BUR.Airport |
State Reference | CA |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 700 ER/LR (CRJ700) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Approach |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
Bur was landing runway 8 and departing runway 15. Weather was IFR in most spots of the sector. Bur tower apreqed a runway 33 departure over gmn for air carrier X. There was an IFR arrival on the vny localizer for ILS runway 16R. I called bur to advise the approximate wait time and the tower requested a heading of 310. Since the departure was a CRJ7; I approved the 310 heading and gave 6;000 ft for departure (rather than the LOA of 4;000 ft.) air carrier X checked on frequency and I believe I issued direct gmn; climbing to 13;000 ft; and pointed aircraft out to vlyr and morr sectors. Air carrier X seemed to be climbing slower than anticipated and I asked if the pilot could maintain his own terrain and obstruction clearance; pilot responded negative due to weather; and he was below the MVA. I turned air carrier X to a 240 heading to get to a lower MVA and told pilot he could expect direct gmn out of 6;000 ft. I anticipated the pilot was requesting runway 33 and the 310 heading and I always try to accommodate the pilot when I can. Most likely; it was not the pilot requesting the heading. I should have simply denied the 310 heading because it is only 20 degrees left turn and still right at the 5;200 ft MVA. I recommend that I should have waited 1-2 minutes longer for the vny ILS arrival to be out of the way; [and] then the higher MVA would not have been a factor.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: SCT Controller described a MVA event involving a BUR IFR departure and traffic inbound to VNY. The reporter acknowledged waiting for the NVY prior to issuing the BUR departure release would have been a better option.
Narrative: BUR was landing Runway 8 and departing Runway 15. Weather was IFR in most spots of the sector. BUR Tower APREQed a Runway 33 departure over GMN for Air Carrier X. There was an IFR arrival on the VNY localizer for ILS Runway 16R. I called BUR to advise the approximate wait time and the Tower requested a heading of 310. Since the departure was a CRJ7; I approved the 310 heading and gave 6;000 FT for departure (rather than the LOA of 4;000 FT.) Air Carrier X checked on frequency and I believe I issued direct GMN; climbing to 13;000 FT; and pointed aircraft out to VLYR and MORR Sectors. Air Carrier X seemed to be climbing slower than anticipated and I asked if the pilot could maintain his own terrain and obstruction clearance; pilot responded negative due to weather; and he was below the MVA. I turned Air Carrier X to a 240 heading to get to a lower MVA and told pilot he could expect direct GMN out of 6;000 FT. I anticipated the pilot was requesting Runway 33 and the 310 heading and I always try to accommodate the pilot when I can. Most likely; it was not the pilot requesting the heading. I should have simply denied the 310 heading because it is only 20 degrees left turn and still right at the 5;200 FT MVA. I recommend that I should have waited 1-2 minutes longer for the VNY ILS arrival to be out of the way; [and] then the higher MVA would not have been a factor.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.