Narrative:

Signed in at sector 10; eram was in channel B. All of my altimeters were stacked in the upper left hand corner. The relieving specialist showed me a route display for a C130 that had the plane going to a gfs radial. I was redistributing my altimeters and asked all aircraft to standby; after I finished; I made a couple of transmissions before I noticed had turned east toward a hot restricted area and hot MOA R2507/kane east. I asked the C130 where he was going. He said to work in kane east. I asked him if he was cancelling IFR and proceeding VFR as the area was currently hot. He responded; no I'm on a flight plan. At this juncture the plane had already passed about 1 mile from R2507; and was heading toward kane east. The specialist at 09 jumped on the line with yuma; while I turned the C130 back to the west. The route display was entirely incorrect from the filed flight plan of this aircraft and it created a very dangerous situation. I'm informing you of this dangerous situation that eram creates with peoples settings! My attention is on setting my scope up; not with the planes. I have to drag about 12 altimeters from the upper left hand of the scope to their positions. Take eram offline. Do not bring eram back up until it can be demonstrated these and many more issues are fixed. I thought we worked in a safety first environment; not one that pushes flawed new systems through with words like; 'they're working on that; or; it'll get fixed on the next update; or there's a work around for that'.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ZLA Controller voiced concern regarding ERAM anomalies; suggesting ERAM be taken off line until some of the identified flaws are changed.

Narrative: Signed in at Sector 10; ERAM was in Channel B. All of my altimeters were stacked in the upper left hand corner. The relieving specialist showed me a route display for a C130 that had the plane going to a GFS radial. I was redistributing my altimeters and asked all aircraft to standby; after I finished; I made a couple of transmissions before I noticed had turned east toward a hot restricted area and hot MOA R2507/Kane East. I asked the C130 where he was going. He said to work in Kane East. I asked him if he was cancelling IFR and proceeding VFR as the area was currently hot. He responded; no I'm on a flight plan. At this juncture the plane had already passed about 1 mile from R2507; and was heading toward Kane East. The specialist at 09 jumped on the line with Yuma; while I turned the C130 back to the West. The route display was entirely incorrect from the filed flight plan of this aircraft and it created a very dangerous situation. I'm informing you of this dangerous situation that ERAM creates with peoples settings! My attention is on setting my scope up; not with the planes. I have to drag about 12 altimeters from the upper left hand of the scope to their positions. Take ERAM offline. Do not bring ERAM back up until it can be demonstrated these and many more issues are fixed. I thought we worked in a safety first environment; not one that pushes flawed new systems through with words like; 'they're working on that; or; it'll get fixed on the next update; or there's a work around for that'.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.