37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1059915 |
Time | |
Date | 201301 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B757-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
We attempted a rolling takeoff. After selecting autothrottles the captain (pilot flying) noticed the throttles wouldn't advance above mid-range using either the autothrottles or by pushing on them manually. We performed a low speed abort at 60 KTS without incident. Back at the gate; the mechanic informed us that some pins that restrict throttle movement were not removed after some recent fuel control maintenance. This was a classic attention to detail mistake. The plane was late coming from the hangar where the fuel control units had been worked on. I don't know it for a fact; but I feel the mechanics might have been rushed to return the aircraft to service.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Two pilots and a Mechanic report about Part Power Stops (PPS) that had not been removed from both engines on a B757-200 aircraft after a Fuel Flow Governor (FFG) had been replaced. The Part Power Stops prevented full takeoff power; requiring a Rejected Takeoff (RTO).
Narrative: We attempted a rolling takeoff. After selecting autothrottles the Captain (pilot flying) noticed the throttles wouldn't advance above mid-range using either the autothrottles or by pushing on them manually. We performed a low speed abort at 60 KTS without incident. Back at the gate; the Mechanic informed us that some pins that restrict throttle movement were not removed after some recent Fuel Control maintenance. This was a classic attention to detail mistake. The plane was late coming from the hangar where the Fuel Control Units had been worked on. I don't know it for a fact; but I feel the mechanics might have been rushed to return the aircraft to service.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.