Narrative:

My cessna is nearly unique at this point because it has both a garmin gdl-88 supplying a garmin GNS-430 (tis-B) and an avidyne TAS-600 (TAS) displaying on both a garmin gtn-750 and an avidyne multihazard display (mhd). [Southwest of cmh descending through 2500 feet]; the tis-B produced a TA for traffic inside of a mile and 200 feet below me at 1:30 o'clock and on an intersecting course. No traffic was seen out the window at the 1:30 position. The TAS did not see any traffic at 1:30 o'clock but did locate traffic inside of a mile and going away (same vector as the tis-B) at the same time as the TA and at the same altitude (200 feet below me) but at the 7:30 o'clock position. This traffic was confirmed by visual sighting. It appears that the tis-B misplotted the location of the traffic and generated a fallacious TA. TAS data appears to have been correct. This circumstance repeated itself about 2 minutes later without a TA with tis-B traffic at 2 o'clock and a mile and a half at 500' below my altitude. No traffic was seen at the tis-B report location but new traffic was confirmed at the same altitude and vector on TAS at 8 o'clock and a mile and a half. It appears that the tis-B uplink provided incorrect locations for ads-B traffic that was simultaneously painted by TAS and visually confirmed at the TAS reported altitude; position and vector. Tis-B was incorrect and; in reduced visibility created a high accident potential situation because a turn away from the tis-B traffic would have resulted in closure with the actual TAS traffic and the development of a potential mid-air collision scenario.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: Cessna pilot using both TIS-B and TAS for traffic avoidance reports erroneous target information from the TIS-B. The TIS indicated traffic at 1:30 coming toward the reporter and TAS indicated traffic at 7:30 going away on the same heading. The TAS traffic was visually confirmed.

Narrative: My Cessna is nearly unique at this point because it has both a Garmin GDL-88 supplying a Garmin GNS-430 (TIS-B) and an Avidyne TAS-600 (TAS) displaying on both a Garmin GTN-750 and an Avidyne MultiHazard Display (MHD). [Southwest of CMH descending through 2500 feet]; the TIS-B produced a TA for traffic inside of a mile and 200 feet below me at 1:30 o'clock and on an intersecting course. No traffic was seen out the window at the 1:30 position. The TAS did not see any traffic at 1:30 o'clock but did locate traffic inside of a mile and going away (same vector as the TIS-B) at the same time as the TA and at the same altitude (200 feet below me) but at the 7:30 o'clock position. This traffic was confirmed by visual sighting. It appears that the TIS-B misplotted the location of the traffic and generated a fallacious TA. TAS data appears to have been correct. This circumstance repeated itself about 2 minutes later without a TA with TIS-B traffic at 2 o'clock and a mile and a half at 500' below my altitude. No traffic was seen at the TIS-B report location but new traffic was confirmed at the same altitude and vector on TAS at 8 o'clock and a mile and a half. It appears that the TIS-B uplink provided incorrect locations for ADS-B traffic that was simultaneously painted by TAS and visually confirmed at the TAS reported altitude; position and vector. TIS-B was incorrect and; in reduced visibility created a high accident potential situation because a turn away from the TIS-B traffic would have resulted in closure with the actual TAS traffic and the development of a potential mid-air collision scenario.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.