37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1087992 |
Time | |
Date | 201305 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.ARTCC |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Baron 58/58TC |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Route In Use | Direct |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Pitot-Static System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Private |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 20.2 Flight Crew Total 1397.5 Flight Crew Type 672.5 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical |
Narrative:
Climbing through 9;000 [ft] on the way to 15;000 and eventually FL180 in IMC; I noticed the airspeed deteriorating. I reduced angle of attack to increase airspeed and the climb became a 1;000 FPM descent. Airspeed did not increase at a commensurate rate for that amount of descent. My initial thought was that I was feeling the effects of a mountain wave. I crosschecked instruments with the GPS and determined that the airspeed indicator was inaccurate. I concluded pitot heat was added too late to melt some ice. Shortly thereafter I broke out on top. I continued the flight. As the climb continued the airspeed continued to decay and settled at about 80 KTS for the cruise. I concluded that the ice blockage was partial and in a position where the pitot heat was not effective. I tried 'alternate air;' but there was no change in the airspeed or altimeter. When descending the airspeed increased and I made an uneventful ILS approach to VMC and then a visual approach and landing. On final approach the airspeed appeared to be about normal. During cruise it seemed very difficult to maintain consistent altitude. And I noticed that pressure differential did not reach the max for a 58P of 3.9psi (which it had on a flight two weeks earlier) but settled in on 3.1. I did not link these facts together.[on the next flight] I ensured that all anti ice was turned on when cleared for takeoff and departed. Again the airspeed decayed as I was in IMC. I continued flight cross checking speed with GPS. Encountered light to moderate rime enroute at 15;000 ft for first half of flight. Again the pressure differential was 3.1 and altitude was difficult to maintain exactly at assigned level. Needle would blip up 100 ft in a fraction of a second and then back; or down a few hundred ft in a second or two requiring a climb back to altitude. Cross checked altimeter with GPS altitude and saw a wide variation; thousands of ft. Broke clear of the icing and continued in VMC. Upon descent; the airspeed increased with descent to a value that appeared normal on final approach. I now suspect a static leak inside the pressure vessel due to recent maintenance. The plane is currently in the shop to confirm the suspicion of a static leak.I had continued two flights with this degraded equipment creating a new pilot error (continued flight with a malfunction).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: BE58 pilot initially attributed airspeed and altitude indication anomalies to environmental effects; but upon further assessment concluded that a static leak inside the pressure vessel was more likely.
Narrative: Climbing through 9;000 [FT] on the way to 15;000 and eventually FL180 in IMC; I noticed the airspeed deteriorating. I reduced angle of attack to increase airspeed and the climb became a 1;000 FPM descent. Airspeed did not increase at a commensurate rate for that amount of descent. My initial thought was that I was feeling the effects of a mountain wave. I crosschecked instruments with the GPS and determined that the airspeed indicator was inaccurate. I concluded Pitot Heat was added too late to melt some ice. Shortly thereafter I broke out on top. I continued the flight. As the climb continued the airspeed continued to decay and settled at about 80 KTS for the cruise. I concluded that the ice blockage was partial and in a position where the pitot heat was not effective. I tried 'alternate air;' but there was no change in the airspeed or altimeter. When descending the airspeed increased and I made an uneventful ILS approach to VMC and then a visual approach and landing. On final approach the airspeed appeared to be about normal. During cruise it seemed very difficult to maintain consistent altitude. And I noticed that pressure differential did not reach the max for a 58P of 3.9psi (which it had on a flight two weeks earlier) but settled in on 3.1. I did not link these facts together.[On the next flight] I ensured that all anti ice was turned on when cleared for takeoff and departed. Again the airspeed decayed as I was in IMC. I continued flight cross checking speed with GPS. Encountered light to moderate rime enroute at 15;000 FT for first half of flight. Again the pressure differential was 3.1 and altitude was difficult to maintain exactly at assigned level. Needle would blip up 100 FT in a fraction of a second and then back; or down a few hundred FT in a second or two requiring a climb back to altitude. Cross checked altimeter with GPS altitude and saw a wide variation; thousands of FT. Broke clear of the icing and continued in VMC. Upon descent; the airspeed increased with descent to a value that appeared normal on final approach. I now suspect a static leak inside the pressure vessel due to recent maintenance. The plane is currently in the shop to confirm the suspicion of a static leak.I had continued two flights with this degraded equipment creating a new pilot error (continued flight with a malfunction).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.