37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1118873 |
Time | |
Date | 201309 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | TPA.TRACON |
State Reference | FL |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | British Aerospace Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 52 Flight Crew Total 11450 Flight Crew Type 2300 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
As we were being vectored for an ILS; TRACON gave us successive headings that turned us toward localizer interception. Then we heard and acknowledged a heading change to 170 degrees; almost 180 degrees from the inbound course. We were still several miles away from the localizer course. I commented that was odd; the pm said they must have had a conflict and wanted us behind another aircraft. A few moments later; TRACON commented that there were two aircraft with similar sounding callsigns; and called aircraft X (us) to return to 330 degrees heading; our last previous intercept course; and for aircraft Y to fly heading 170. No mention was made of any conflict. All subsequent radio calls were made with our complete call sign; and active crew concurrence of each transmission. We noted that the other aircraft required repeated contact attempts for controller instructions. I should have pressed for verifying the instructions when we received the heading that put us on radar downwind after being on a 45 deg heading to intercept final. Had we been aware there was a similar callsign situation; we would have been more wary.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Two aircraft were on TPA TRACON frequency with similar sound call signs; one aircraft took the other aircraft vector which put it nearly 180 out of the intended track. ATC realized the error and became more accurate.
Narrative: As we were being vectored for an ILS; TRACON gave us successive headings that turned us toward localizer interception. Then we heard and acknowledged a heading change to 170 degrees; almost 180 degrees from the inbound course. We were still several miles away from the localizer course. I commented that was odd; the PM said they must have had a conflict and wanted us behind another aircraft. A few moments later; TRACON commented that there were two aircraft with similar sounding callsigns; and called Aircraft X (us) to return to 330 degrees heading; our last previous intercept course; and for Aircraft Y to fly heading 170. No mention was made of any conflict. All subsequent radio calls were made with our complete call sign; and active crew concurrence of each transmission. We noted that the other aircraft required repeated contact attempts for Controller instructions. I should have pressed for verifying the instructions when we received the heading that put us on radar downwind after being on a 45 deg heading to intercept final. Had we been aware there was a similar callsign situation; we would have been more wary.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.