37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 113257 |
Time | |
Date | 198906 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lgb |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 500 agl bound upper : 1000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : lgb |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Flight Phase | other |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 10000 flight time type : 1000 |
ASRS Report | 113257 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Ambiguous |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Situations | |
ATC Facility | procedure or policy : unspecified |
Narrative:
During an ILS approach runway 30, reported visibility 6 mi in haze and smoke. Visibility lower to the southeast. We sighted the field at 1400 on the glide slope. At about 800' tower called 2 targets at 10 and 11 O'clock. After a delay, we sighted both targets. They were on a left visual downwind 25L supposedly at 1000. The first was obviously below that altitude. We continued the approach and landing without deviation from the approach. I question the practice at lgb of flying a VFR downwind over/through an ILS approach final when the aircraft on the ILS is under an IFR clearance. The procedure is predicated on the IFR aircraft sighting the VFR downwind traffic even though they are IFR. Additionally, we have been directed by the company to fly above the glide slope in the interest of noise abatement. The procedure also precludes an early go around by the aircraft on the instrument approach.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACFT ON DOWNWIND APCH TO INTERSECTING RWY CROSS THROUGH ILS APCH PATH OF REPORTER ACFT.
Narrative: DURING AN ILS APCH RWY 30, REPORTED VISIBILITY 6 MI IN HAZE AND SMOKE. VISIBILITY LOWER TO THE SE. WE SIGHTED THE FIELD AT 1400 ON THE GLIDE SLOPE. AT ABOUT 800' TWR CALLED 2 TARGETS AT 10 AND 11 O'CLOCK. AFTER A DELAY, WE SIGHTED BOTH TARGETS. THEY WERE ON A LEFT VISUAL DOWNWIND 25L SUPPOSEDLY AT 1000. THE FIRST WAS OBVIOUSLY BELOW THAT ALT. WE CONTINUED THE APCH AND LNDG WITHOUT DEVIATION FROM THE APCH. I QUESTION THE PRACTICE AT LGB OF FLYING A VFR DOWNWIND OVER/THROUGH AN ILS APCH FINAL WHEN THE ACFT ON THE ILS IS UNDER AN IFR CLRNC. THE PROC IS PREDICATED ON THE IFR ACFT SIGHTING THE VFR DOWNWIND TFC EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE IFR. ADDITIONALLY, WE HAVE BEEN DIRECTED BY THE COMPANY TO FLY ABOVE THE GLIDE SLOPE IN THE INTEREST OF NOISE ABATEMENT. THE PROC ALSO PRECLUDES AN EARLY GO AROUND BY THE ACFT ON THE INSTRUMENT APCH.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.