An air carrier departed sbgr with a revised flight plan; the first plan rejected by ATC; and after p...

Narrative:

We were told by amazonica control that we were not flying the routing filed in our filed flight plan. We were flying the routing in the flight plan provided to us by dispatch. During the initial flight planning process; dispatch had filed a flight plan that was rejected by ATC. We were told the flight plan was not in compliance with the NOTAM regarding preferred routings out of sbgr. The NOTAM was for aircraft entering brazilian airspace between xa:00Z and xd:00Z. We were scheduled to enter brazilian airspace before the xa:00Z. As per ATC request; a new flight plan was accomplished that fully complied with the NOTAM routing. We left sbgr operations with an operational flight plan showing release 2. We did not see release 1. After passing bomal; amazonica control advised us that we were deviating from our flight plan. They had on file a different routing that did not comply with the NOTAM routing. It may have been the routing originally filed by our dispatcher in release 1.this is the second time in 30 days that our company's flight planning system has failed to provide me with an acceptable; legal flight plan. It appears that the flight planning system does not take into account notams; and does not comply with various countries flight planning restrictions.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: An Air Carrier departed SBGR with a revised flight plan; the first plan rejected by ATC; and after passing BOMAL were notified by Amazonica Control that they had deviated from the flight plan. There may been NOTAMs not complied with.

Narrative: We were told by Amazonica Control that we were not flying the routing filed in our filed flight plan. We were flying the routing in the flight plan provided to us by Dispatch. During the initial flight planning process; Dispatch had filed a flight plan that was rejected by ATC. We were told the flight plan was not in compliance with the NOTAM regarding preferred routings out of SBGR. The NOTAM was for aircraft entering Brazilian airspace between XA:00Z and XD:00Z. We were scheduled to enter Brazilian airspace before the XA:00Z. As per ATC request; a new flight plan was accomplished that fully complied with the NOTAM routing. We left SBGR Operations with an Operational Flight Plan showing Release 2. We did not see Release 1. After passing BOMAL; Amazonica Control advised us that we were deviating from our flight plan. They had on file a different routing that did not comply with the NOTAM routing. It may have been the routing originally filed by our Dispatcher in Release 1.This is the second time in 30 days that our Company's flight planning system has failed to provide me with an acceptable; legal flight plan. It appears that the flight planning system does not take into account NOTAMs; and does not comply with various countries flight planning restrictions.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Attributes
ACN	1142371
Time
Date	201401
Local Time Of Day	0001-0600
Place
Locale Reference	SBAZ.ARTCC
State Reference	FO
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Night
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	Widebody Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Flight Phase	Cruise
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Function	Captain Pilot Flying
Experience	Flight Crew Last 90 Days 150 Flight Crew Total 25000 Flight Crew Type 1500
Person 2
Function	First Officer Pilot Not Flying
Experience	Flight Crew Last 90 Days 240 Flight Crew Total 17000 Flight Crew Type 1300
Events
Anomaly	ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Track / Heading All Types

An air carrier departed sbgr with a revised flight plan; the first plan rejected by ATC; and after passing bomal were notified by amazonica control that they had deviated from the flight plan. There may been notams not complied with.