B737-700 flight crew reports overlooking a NOTAM raising the da for the runway 28R ILS 337 feet due ...

Narrative:

At cruise altitude; oak ATIS reported 300 foot ceiling and one mile visibility. We briefed and set up for the ILS to runway 30 shortened. We reviewed the NOTAM's for runway 30 since there were several. I noticed the ILS to runway 28R went down to 200 foot ceiling. I did not check the NOTAM's for ILS 28R at cruise. Fifteen miles from the runway on vectors; we were directed to climb to 5;000 feet and turn downwind. There was an opposite direction aircraft on missed approach from runway 12. On downwind; we discussed the ceiling must be lower than 300 feet. I mentioned that the ILS to 28R has approach lights; goes down to 200 feet; and is further inland than runway 30. We set up; briefed; and flew the ILS 28R approach to landing. I did not check NOTAM's for ILS 28R while on downwind. While at the gate preparing for the next leg; I asked dispatch for a takeoff alternate and then noticed the NOTAM for the ILS 28R da of 337 feet for a 191 foot crane .2 NM northeast of runway 28R. Per the chart; we had set and flown to a da of 206 feet. The approach lights were in sight by the approaching minimums call; but we were not aware of the NOTAM when we flew the approach. I had two chances to review the NOTAMS for 28R and missed them both times. The first time; because of my focus on a newly configured runway; and the second time; because I was rushing to set up and brief the new approach.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B737-700 flight crew reports overlooking a NOTAM raising the DA for the Runway 28R ILS 337 feet due to a crane near the approach end of the runway. The published DA of 209 feet is used for the approach and landing and the error is not discovered until after gate arrival.

Narrative: At cruise altitude; OAK ATIS reported 300 foot ceiling and one mile visibility. We briefed and set up for the ILS to Runway 30 shortened. We reviewed the NOTAM's for Runway 30 since there were several. I noticed the ILS to Runway 28R went down to 200 foot ceiling. I did not check the NOTAM's for ILS 28R at cruise. Fifteen miles from the runway on vectors; we were directed to climb to 5;000 feet and turn downwind. There was an opposite direction aircraft on missed approach from Runway 12. On downwind; we discussed the ceiling must be lower than 300 feet. I mentioned that the ILS to 28R has approach lights; goes down to 200 feet; and is further inland than Runway 30. We set up; briefed; and flew the ILS 28R approach to landing. I did not check NOTAM's for ILS 28R while on downwind. While at the gate preparing for the next leg; I asked Dispatch for a takeoff alternate and then noticed the NOTAM for the ILS 28R DA of 337 feet for a 191 foot crane .2 NM northeast of Runway 28R. Per the chart; we had set and flown to a DA of 206 feet. The approach lights were in sight by the APPROACHING MINIMUMS call; but we were not aware of the NOTAM when we flew the approach. I had two chances to review the NOTAMS for 28R and missed them both times. The first time; because of my focus on a newly configured runway; and the second time; because I was rushing to set up and brief the new approach.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

Attributes
ACN	1150446
Time
Date	201402
Local Time Of Day	0601-1200
Place
Locale Reference	OAK.Airport
State Reference	CA
Environment
Flight Conditions	IMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Make Model Name	B737-700
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Flight Phase	Initial Approach
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Function	Captain
Qualification	Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP)
Experience	Flight Crew Last 90 Days 260 Flight Crew Type 11700
Person 2
Function	Pilot Flying First Officer
Experience	Flight Crew Last 90 Days 286 Flight Crew Type 2000
Events
Anomaly	Deviation - Procedural FAR Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy

B737-700 flight crew reports overlooking a NOTAM raising the da for the runway 28R ILS 337 feet due to a crane near the approach end of the runway. The published da of 209 feet is used for the approach and landing and the error is not discovered until after gate arrival.