Narrative:

Ewr has been utilizing a new experimental departure, the hush one. While I have no problem with the procedure itself, I have a major problem with issuing a departure procedure on clearance where the procedure is not published and has to be read to every aircraft. It took us over 20 mins to get a clearance because of frequency chaos. Clearance gave us 'turn at 3 DME'. Ewr has no VOR DME. Okay another trip through frequency chaos to be told it was off the 22L ILS/DME. In a situation where clearance delivery is already saturated, the use of this procedure and a single frequency is unacceptable. Maybe a second clearance frequency for peak times would make sense.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: BURDENSOME DELAY IN RECEIVING CLRNC FROM CLRNC DELIVERY ACCOUNT UNPUBLISHED PROC THAT HAD TO BE RELATED IN ENTIRETY WITH REPEATS.

Narrative: EWR HAS BEEN UTILIZING A NEW EXPERIMENTAL DEP, THE HUSH ONE. WHILE I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THE PROC ITSELF, I HAVE A MAJOR PROBLEM WITH ISSUING A DEP PROC ON CLRNC WHERE THE PROC IS NOT PUBLISHED AND HAS TO BE READ TO EVERY ACFT. IT TOOK US OVER 20 MINS TO GET A CLRNC BECAUSE OF FREQ CHAOS. CLRNC GAVE US 'TURN AT 3 DME'. EWR HAS NO VOR DME. OKAY ANOTHER TRIP THROUGH FREQ CHAOS TO BE TOLD IT WAS OFF THE 22L ILS/DME. IN A SITUATION WHERE CLRNC DELIVERY IS ALREADY SATURATED, THE USE OF THIS PROC AND A SINGLE FREQ IS UNACCEPTABLE. MAYBE A SECOND CLRNC FREQ FOR PEAK TIMES WOULD MAKE SENSE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.