37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1152900 |
Time | |
Date | 201402 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Cargo Door |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying First Officer |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 292 Flight Crew Type 1800 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 303 Flight Crew Type 6000 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
I was PF on takeoff after deicing. Weather at the time was reporting visibility of 2NM -sn; winds 020/12. My attention was outside when the 80 knot callout was made. It was about this time that I also saw a master caution light. I do not remember the captain stating intention to 'continue' or 'reject; I have the aircraft.' I glanced up briefly and stated 'aft cargo door.' I believe it was at this point I might have led the captain down the path of rejecting the takeoff. The reject was uneventful and I noted a speed of 100 knots on the airspeed indicator. After notifying ATC; we taxied off the active runway on the reverse high speed taxiway. After calculating the rejected takeoff [energy]; we used a conservative number of a three-mile taxi which gave us a 30-minute cooling period before entering the gate area. Neither the flight attendants nor the passengers seemed alarmed by the rejection. Verbalization of intention to 'continue' or 'reject' needs to be stated clearly and immediately. Looking back now; knowing it was only a master caution and around 80 knots; I would have been better off noting the indication to myself and addressing it once airborne to prevent any confusion in the future.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737-300 flight crew experiences an aft cargo door warning at 80 KTS during takeoff with the First Officer flying. When the Captain says nothing; the First Officer announces the warning and the Captain rejects. Maintenance found a strap hanging out of the door.
Narrative: I was PF on takeoff after deicing. Weather at the time was reporting visibility of 2NM -SN; winds 020/12. My attention was outside when the 80 knot callout was made. It was about this time that I also saw a Master Caution light. I do not remember the Captain stating intention to 'continue' or 'reject; I have the aircraft.' I glanced up briefly and stated 'aft cargo door.' I believe it was at this point I might have led the Captain down the path of rejecting the takeoff. The reject was uneventful and I noted a speed of 100 knots on the airspeed indicator. After notifying ATC; we taxied off the active runway on the reverse high speed Taxiway. After calculating the RTO [energy]; we used a conservative number of a three-mile taxi which gave us a 30-minute cooling period before entering the gate area. Neither the flight attendants nor the passengers seemed alarmed by the rejection. Verbalization of intention to 'continue' or 'reject' needs to be stated clearly and immediately. Looking back now; knowing it was only a Master Caution and around 80 knots; I would have been better off noting the indication to myself and addressing it once airborne to prevent any confusion in the future.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.