37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1204961 |
Time | |
Date | 201409 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | HSV.Airport |
State Reference | AL |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Cessna 152 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Route In Use | Direct Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Private |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 31.5 Flight Crew Total 88.2 Flight Crew Type 12.5 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Miss Distance | Horizontal 5280 Vertical 0 |
Narrative:
Was given initial direction by hsv approach to land 36L. I confirmed directions; switched to tower as directed by approach after making visual with 36R. I was in the process of landing on 36R when; approximately one mile out; tower called to verify that I was supposed to be landing on 36L as it appeared that I was setting up to land on 36R which was currently a closed runway. I confirmed that I was incorrectly lined up for 36R; took corrective action; flew over to 36L and landed. My error was that; when creating my cross-country flight log and airport diagram; I did not draw the parallel runway due to 18L-36R being closed. When I looked at my flight log for runway verification I did not have the parallel runway drawn and therefore did not look to differentiate 36L and 36R. Once I made visual with 36R I never looked for a parallel runway. Had I paid more attention to my sectional; or if I had correctly drawn both the active and inactive runways; or if I had utilized an official version of the AFD; I would have known to look for the correct runway.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A newly minted Private Pilot on a cross country to HSV lined up on closed Runway 36R vice Runway 36L for landing. The Tower intervened and appropriate advisories and course adjustments prevented an incident.
Narrative: Was given initial direction by HSV Approach to land 36L. I confirmed directions; switched to Tower as directed by Approach after making visual with 36R. I was in the process of landing on 36R when; approximately one mile out; tower called to verify that I was supposed to be landing on 36L as it appeared that I was setting up to land on 36R which was currently a closed runway. I confirmed that I was incorrectly lined up for 36R; took corrective action; flew over to 36L and landed. My error was that; when creating my cross-country flight log and airport diagram; I did not draw the parallel runway due to 18L-36R being closed. When I looked at my flight log for runway verification I did not have the parallel runway drawn and therefore did not look to differentiate 36L and 36R. Once I made visual with 36R I never looked for a parallel runway. Had I paid more attention to my Sectional; or if I had correctly drawn both the active and inactive runways; or if I had utilized an official version of the AFD; I would have known to look for the correct runway.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.