 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
When cleared by clearance delivery to 'climb via' the phx snobl RNAV departure off the east runway complex the flight crew of a falcon 50 climbed so as to cross goaly at or below 9;000 ft as depicted on the graphic and described in the initial climb text box. As they climbed through 8;000 ft ATC advised they were required to maintain 8;000 ft as stated in the routing text box.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1216421 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201411 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | PHX.Airport |
| State Reference | AZ |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Falcon 50 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
| Route In Use | SID SNOBL1 |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 50 Flight Crew Total 11000 Flight Crew Type 100 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Deviation - Altitude Crossing Restriction Not Met Deviation - Altitude Overshoot Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Captain and I both briefed the SID; reviewed together. Clearance was to fly the SID; which we did; setting 9;000 ft as the terminal altitude in the climb. On our initial call; I stated the altitude climbing to; 9;000 ft.take a look at this chart now; before reading on.TRACON said we should have stopped climb at 8;000. No traffic conflict. We found the 8;000 ft referenced; in the 'routing' section of the chart. Compare that to the altitude note in 'initial climb' and the box note at goaly.controller is correct. I'll bet there are plenty of events.this is really screwed up. Find the guy who made this chart; and suspend his certificate.do you see that the instructions in the initial climb is exactly what we did? I truly don't see why they made this chart this way. It really needs your help to fix it.controller noted that this mistake is common.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: When cleared by Clearance Delivery to 'climb via' the PHX SNOBL RNAV departure off the east runway complex the flight crew of a Falcon 50 climbed so as to cross GOALY at or below 9;000 FT as depicted on the graphic and described in the INITIAL CLIMB text box. As they climbed through 8;000 FT ATC advised they were required to maintain 8;000 FT as stated in the ROUTING text box.
Narrative: Captain and I both briefed the SID; reviewed together. Clearance was to fly the SID; which we did; setting 9;000 FT as the terminal altitude in the climb. On our initial call; I stated the altitude climbing to; 9;000 FT.Take a look at this chart now; before reading on.TRACON said we should have stopped climb at 8;000. No traffic conflict. We found the 8;000 FT referenced; in the 'ROUTING' section of the chart. Compare that to the altitude note in 'INITIAL CLIMB' and the box note at GOALY.Controller is correct. I'll bet there are plenty of events.This is really screwed up. Find the guy who made this chart; and suspend HIS certificate.Do you see that the instructions in the Initial Climb is EXACTLY what we did? I truly don't see why they made this chart this way. It really needs your help to fix it.Controller noted that this mistake is common.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.