37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1217559 |
Time | |
Date | 201411 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Marginal |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Bonanza 36 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | Direct Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Single Pilot Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Private |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 20 Flight Crew Total 1170 Flight Crew Type 970 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural FAR Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
On a VFR flight with intentions to land at ZZZ; aircraft was en-route using VFR flight following. Pilot was notified by ATC of below minimum conditions at ZZZ. Pilot stated that his intentions were to overfly and verify conditions to determine if conditions had improved in order to land. En-route weather received through foreflight application with stratus antenna was reporting current conditions to be marginal VFR with 3SM visibility. Pilot observed greater than 3sm visibility overflying the field. Pilot cancelled VFR flight following and proceeded to land observing greater than 4 SM visibility using GPS instrument. Pilot had checked multiple weather sources before departure and inflight; including calling the ASOS number; and observing the taf. Weather was improving continually. Alternate airports considerations had been made. Pilot was also monitoring the CTAF at ZZZ. Pilot contends that a safe and legal approach and landing was performed. Pilot had been contacted by FAA aviation safety inspector within hours of landing and was questioned in regards to conditions.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: BE36 pilot reports landing at an uncontrolled airport with the AWOS reporting marginal VFR and 3 SM visibility. He believes the visibility was greater than 4 SM but was contacted by an FAA Safety Inspector regarding the legality of the landing.
Narrative: On a VFR flight with intentions to land at ZZZ; aircraft was en-route using VFR flight following. Pilot was notified by ATC of below minimum conditions at ZZZ. Pilot stated that his intentions were to overfly and verify conditions to determine if conditions had improved in order to land. En-route weather received through foreflight application with stratus antenna was reporting current conditions to be Marginal VFR with 3SM visibility. Pilot observed greater than 3sm visibility overflying the field. Pilot cancelled VFR flight following and proceeded to land observing greater than 4 SM visibility using GPS instrument. Pilot had checked multiple weather sources before departure and inflight; including calling the ASOS number; and observing the TAF. Weather was improving continually. Alternate airports considerations had been made. Pilot was also monitoring the CTAF at ZZZ. Pilot contends that a safe and legal approach and landing was performed. Pilot had been contacted by FAA Aviation Safety Inspector within hours of landing and was questioned in regards to conditions.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.