37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 122005 |
Time | |
Date | 198909 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sle |
State Reference | OR |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 3000 msl bound upper : 3500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zse |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : missed approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 45 flight time total : 6800 |
ASRS Report | 122005 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Events | |
Anomaly | altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude non adherence : published procedure non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
I was conducting an IFR checkride. The student filed an IFR flight plan using my name. The WX was clear, VFR over the entire route. We were cleared by center for the NDB approach at salem and to contact salem tower procedure turn inbound. The student started the turn outbnd at the IAF then continued past the outbnd course in a circle until he was actually inbound rather than outbnd. He immediately started descent then realized his mistake and called center that he had missed approach and began climbing to 4000', the altitude he had been at the IAF. He should have flown the missed approach procedure which called for 2600' to the NDB. Center questioned him about his altitude (what altitude he was climbing to) and he answered he never got down and wanted to go back to the NDB and start over. In fact he had only descended less than 500' when he missed approach. I let him go far enough to determine that he would not meet the test standards before correcting the situation. I did not interfere before that point since he immediately discerned his mistake and took action. The IFR checkride was later cancelled due to the student's failure to meet the test standards.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: STUDENT PLT TAKING INSTRUMENT CHECKRIDE MAKES GROSS TRACK DEVIATION ON APCH, DECLARES MISSED APCH, THEN BUSTS MISSED APCH ALT.
Narrative: I WAS CONDUCTING AN IFR CHECKRIDE. THE STUDENT FILED AN IFR FLT PLAN USING MY NAME. THE WX WAS CLEAR, VFR OVER THE ENTIRE ROUTE. WE WERE CLRED BY CENTER FOR THE NDB APCH AT SALEM AND TO CONTACT SALEM TWR PROC TURN INBND. THE STUDENT STARTED THE TURN OUTBND AT THE IAF THEN CONTINUED PAST THE OUTBND COURSE IN A CIRCLE UNTIL HE WAS ACTUALLY INBND RATHER THAN OUTBND. HE IMMEDIATELY STARTED DSCNT THEN REALIZED HIS MISTAKE AND CALLED CENTER THAT HE HAD MISSED APCH AND BEGAN CLIMBING TO 4000', THE ALT HE HAD BEEN AT THE IAF. HE SHOULD HAVE FLOWN THE MISSED APCH PROC WHICH CALLED FOR 2600' TO THE NDB. CENTER QUESTIONED HIM ABOUT HIS ALT (WHAT ALT HE WAS CLIMBING TO) AND HE ANSWERED HE NEVER GOT DOWN AND WANTED TO GO BACK TO THE NDB AND START OVER. IN FACT HE HAD ONLY DESCENDED LESS THAN 500' WHEN HE MISSED APCH. I LET HIM GO FAR ENOUGH TO DETERMINE THAT HE WOULD NOT MEET THE TEST STANDARDS BEFORE CORRECTING THE SITUATION. I DID NOT INTERFERE BEFORE THAT POINT SINCE HE IMMEDIATELY DISCERNED HIS MISTAKE AND TOOK ACTION. THE IFR CHECKRIDE WAS LATER CANCELLED DUE TO THE STUDENT'S FAILURE TO MEET THE TEST STANDARDS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.