37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1230564 |
Time | |
Date | 201501 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | DAL.Airport |
State Reference | TX |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 170 Flight Crew Type 8500 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude Deviation - Procedural Clearance Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
I was pilot monitoring (pm). Captain was pilot flying (PF). Weather conditions were clear with unrestricted visibility. Dal was landing north (runways 31L/right). After check-in with regional approach control; we were cleared direct to myles fix; instructed to join the dal runway 31L localizer final and cleared to descend to 3;000 feet MSL. We complied with all instructions. Approaching myles; we reported the [airport] and runways 31L/right in sight and were cleared a visual approach to runway 31L. We continued on the ILS runway 31L localizer as a backup to the visual; and continued descent to 2;200 feet MSL to intercept the runway 31L glideslope at jakid. As we continued; regional approach informed us of traffic (a learjet) at 3;000 feet MSL on a right base for dal runway 31R. We initially responded we were searching for the called traffic and continued in-bound on the approach and continued slowing and configuring the aircraft. A few moments later; we both visually acquired the learjet traffic and reported 'learjet traffic; in sight' to regional control. Regional control acknowledged our report and instructed us to contact love tower. Upon initial check-in with love tower; we reported we were on the visual to runway 31L and had the learjet traffic to runway 31R; in sight'. Love tower cleared us to land on runway 31L. Approaching jakid; runway 31L glideslope intercept (gsi); we received a TCAS TA; which correlated to the learjet on our right side landing runway 31R. Shortly after beginning our final descent on the glideslope/glidepath to runway 31L; we received a descend TCAS resolution advisory (RA); again correlating to the learjet traffic on our right side; on final to runway 31R. Captain/PF; complied with the RA; disconnected the autopilot; increased the rate of descent to approximately 1;000 fpm; in compliance with the TCAS RA directions; as we finished configuring the aircraft for landing. At approximately; 1;500 feet MSL; the TCAS announced 'clear of conflict'; and the captain/PF decreased the descent rate to re-intercept a more normal three degree final ILS glideslope/glidepath. We reported complying with the TCAS RA to love tower; when it occurred; and love tower asked for our intentions. We did not receive any egwps cautions or warnings during compliance with the TCAS descend RA.we could have planned to intercept the glideslope/glidepath at a different altitude; we could have intercepted at 3;000 feet MSL and the learjet traffic to runway 31R at 2;200 feet MSL. ATC/regional control could have directed some lateral offset to aircraft joining a parallel final; 1 NM trail offset. Aircraft joining a parallel final with aircraft established on the parallel final; should attempt all means of achieving some 'offset' vertical (altitude); lateral (ease onto the final/runway centerline from their side of final); and/or establish plus maintain some horizontal offset (1NM offset trail).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A flight crew on final for the left parallel runway received a TCAS RA with respect to a Learjet on a base leg to the right runway at Dallas Love. The runways are about 1/2 mile apart.
Narrative: I was Pilot Monitoring (PM). Captain was Pilot Flying (PF). Weather conditions were clear with unrestricted visibility. DAL was landing north (Runways 31L/R). After check-in with Regional Approach Control; we were cleared direct to MYLES fix; instructed to join the DAL Runway 31L Localizer final and cleared to descend to 3;000 feet MSL. We complied with all instructions. Approaching MYLES; we reported the [airport] and Runways 31L/R in sight and were cleared a Visual Approach to Runway 31L. We continued on the ILS Runway 31L Localizer as a backup to the Visual; and continued descent to 2;200 feet MSL to intercept the Runway 31L glideslope at JAKID. As we continued; Regional Approach informed us of traffic (a Learjet) at 3;000 feet MSL on a right base for DAL Runway 31R. We initially responded we were searching for the called traffic and continued in-bound on the approach and continued slowing and configuring the aircraft. A few moments later; we both visually acquired the Learjet traffic and reported 'Learjet traffic; in sight' to Regional Control. Regional Control acknowledged our report and instructed us to contact LOVE Tower. Upon initial check-in with LOVE Tower; we reported we were on the Visual to Runway 31L and had the Learjet traffic to Runway 31R; in sight'. LOVE Tower cleared us to land on Runway 31L. Approaching JAKID; Runway 31L glideslope intercept (GSI); we received a TCAS TA; which correlated to the Learjet on our right side landing Runway 31R. Shortly after beginning our final descent on the glideslope/glidepath to Runway 31L; we received a descend TCAS Resolution Advisory (RA); again correlating to the Learjet traffic on our right side; on final to Runway 31R. Captain/PF; complied with the RA; disconnected the autopilot; increased the rate of descent to approximately 1;000 fpm; in compliance with the TCAS RA directions; as we finished configuring the aircraft for landing. At approximately; 1;500 feet MSL; the TCAS announced 'Clear of conflict'; and the Captain/PF decreased the descent rate to re-intercept a more normal three degree final ILS glideslope/glidepath. We reported complying with the TCAS RA to LOVE Tower; when it occurred; and LOVE Tower asked for our intentions. We did not receive any EGWPS cautions or warnings during compliance with the TCAS descend RA.We could have planned to intercept the glideslope/glidepath at a different altitude; we could have intercepted at 3;000 feet MSL and the Learjet traffic to Runway 31R at 2;200 feet MSL. ATC/Regional Control could have directed some lateral offset to aircraft joining a parallel final; 1 NM trail offset. Aircraft joining a parallel final with aircraft established on the parallel final; should attempt all means of achieving some 'offset' vertical (altitude); lateral (ease onto the final/runway centerline from their side of final); and/or establish plus maintain some horizontal offset (1NM offset trail).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.