37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1231842 |
Time | |
Date | 201501 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | D01.TRACON |
State Reference | CO |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-700 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Route In Use | SID EEONS4 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | AHRS/ND |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 125 Flight Crew Type 10500 |
Person 2 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 120 Flight Crew Type 7200 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Altitude Crossing Restriction Not Met Deviation - Altitude Overshoot Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Track / Heading All Types |
Narrative:
While departing den on the EEONS4; ATC cleared us out of our pre departure clearance limit of 10;000 to 'climb via SID to FL230.' as the pilot not flying (PNF); I was errantly thinking 'maintain FL230;' which would have been an unrestricted climb. The pilot flying (PF) was hand flying the departure; so I dialed 230 in the MCP and perceived I coordinated with the PF to delete the intermediate altitudes; thinking they were no longer necessary. The PF apparently wasn't really hearing what I was saying because he verified the steps before I executed them. He was busy hand flying and watching the altitudes on the departure and attempting to comply with them. Because I had deleted the 12;000B restriction at shobo; the flight director was climbing steeply toward that restriction. The PF attempted to level off there; still (correctly) believing we needed to comply; but the climb rate exceeded his ability to smoothly level off at 12;000 and we overshot the level off at shobo by 300- 400 feet before correcting down. The controller seemingly did not believe we were leveling off; so he issued a vector away from the fix and asserted we had been cleared to 'climb via' and not an unrestricted climb. After I acknowledged the vector; he cleared us to climb unrestricted to FL230.I made errant entries to the FMC because I mixed up the definitions of climb clearances. Ironically; I had just reviewed the study guide regarding the 'climb via' preceding a 'climb and maintain' altitude earlier in the day. Perhaps my mind had locked on the answer to that question and thought this was the same situation. In the future; I will need to double-check my thinking of such clearances. I will also reconsider the PF's task loading in coordination events where I want him/her to verify something while they are hand flying. Looking back at the climb definitions I certainly knew what each meant; and have periodically reviewed them; yet I still misapplied them in this circumstance.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737-700 First Officer (FO) experiences a navigation display failure during takeoff which quickly corrects itself once airborne. ATC assigns a heading of 100 but the Captain sets 010 in the MCP which the FO does not detect due to troubleshooting the navigation display problem. Later in the EEONS4 departure; ATC assigns a climb via to FL230 which the Captain interprets as a climb to FL230. An overshoot occurs at SHOBO.
Narrative: While departing DEN on the EEONS4; ATC cleared us out of our PDC limit of 10;000 to 'climb via SID to FL230.' As the pilot not flying (PNF); I was errantly thinking 'maintain FL230;' which would have been an unrestricted climb. The pilot flying (PF) was hand flying the departure; so I dialed 230 in the MCP and perceived I coordinated with the PF to delete the intermediate altitudes; thinking they were no longer necessary. The PF apparently wasn't really hearing what I was saying because he verified the steps before I executed them. He was busy hand flying and watching the altitudes on the departure and attempting to comply with them. Because I had deleted the 12;000B restriction at SHOBO; the flight director was climbing steeply toward that restriction. The PF attempted to level off there; still (correctly) believing we needed to comply; but the climb rate exceeded his ability to smoothly level off at 12;000 and we overshot the level off at SHOBO by 300- 400 feet before correcting down. The Controller seemingly did not believe we were leveling off; so he issued a vector away from the fix and asserted we had been cleared to 'climb via' and not an unrestricted climb. After I acknowledged the vector; he cleared us to climb unrestricted to FL230.I made errant entries to the FMC because I mixed up the definitions of climb clearances. Ironically; I had just reviewed the study guide regarding the 'climb via' preceding a 'climb and maintain' altitude earlier in the day. Perhaps my mind had locked on the answer to that question and thought this was the same situation. In the future; I will need to double-check my thinking of such clearances. I will also reconsider the PF's task loading in coordination events where I want him/her to verify something while they are hand flying. Looking back at the climb definitions I certainly knew what each meant; and have periodically reviewed them; yet I still misapplied them in this circumstance.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.