![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1241829 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201502 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Caravan 208B |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
| Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
| Route In Use | Direct |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Beechcraft Twin Piston Undifferentiated or Other Model |
| Flight Phase | Descent |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 291 Flight Crew Total 1508 Flight Crew Type 1108 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Conflict NMAC Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
| Miss Distance | Horizontal 200 Vertical 200 |
Narrative:
We departed from runway xy. On CTAF; we announced departing the pattern to the south (track of 165 degrees direct to destination as cleared). An inbound baron they were south-west of the airport entering the downwind for runway xy. As runway xy has a published right-hand traffic pattern; we assumed the traffic would be staying west of our position by several miles; and would be no factor. I ensured all exterior lights remained on and switched the recognition lights to 'wig-wag' mode to increase viability. Shortly after; while climbing to our clearance altitude; we made visual contact with an aircraft above us at approximately our 1-o'clock position and descending. I immediately began an evasive maneuver by descending and turning away. Once clear and resuming our climb; the baron pilot asked who he almost hit with about 300 feet to spare. I informed him that runway xy had a published right-hand pattern; and that his incorrect position report indicated that he should have been to the south-west of the airport and no conflict. Instead; his incorrect left-downwind entry placed him in our departure corridor. He responded by stating he was unaware that it was a published non-standard pattern for runway xy.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A Caravan 208B flight crew departed Runway XY and turned to 165 degrees direct to their destination as cleared. When a Baron reported inbound from the southwest to the downwind for Runway XY the Caravan crew believed there would be no conflict; since Runway XY utilizes a right hand pattern. A 200 foot vertical and horizontal NMAC resulted when the Baron pilot; admittedly; was unaware of the non-standard right hand pattern and had instead proceed to the east to enter left traffic.
Narrative: We departed from runway XY. On CTAF; we announced departing the pattern to the south (track of 165 degrees direct to destination as cleared). An inbound Baron they were south-west of the airport entering the downwind for Runway XY. As RWY XY has a published right-hand traffic pattern; we assumed the traffic would be staying west of our position by several miles; and would be no factor. I ensured all exterior lights remained on and switched the recognition lights to 'wig-wag' mode to increase viability. Shortly after; while climbing to our clearance altitude; we made visual contact with an aircraft above us at approximately our 1-o'clock position and descending. I immediately began an evasive maneuver by descending and turning away. Once clear and resuming our climb; the Baron pilot asked who he almost hit with about 300 feet to spare. I informed him that Runway XY had a published right-hand pattern; and that his incorrect position report indicated that he should have been to the south-west of the airport and no conflict. Instead; his incorrect left-downwind entry placed him in our departure corridor. He responded by stating he was unaware that it was a published non-standard pattern for Runway XY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.