37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1257953 |
Time | |
Date | 201504 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | CLT.Airport |
State Reference | NC |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER/LR (CRJ200) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | A321 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Inflight Event / Encounter Wake Vortex Encounter |
Narrative:
Descriptionwhile on visual approach to 36L at clt; just after glideslope intercept at canuk (4000 feet) aircraft encountered wake turbulence from the preceding aircraft approximately 3-4 miles ahead of us. ATC had just assigned a speed of 160KIAS and we were decelerating through 170KIAS. Airspeed was 165-170KIAS during the event with flaps at 20 degrees. The aircraft rapidly rolled to the left; right; left; right. Or; it may have been right; left; right; left. The autopilot kicked off and the stall warbler briefly sounded. As quickly as it started; it ended; and the aircraft automatically returned to stable flight. The entire event may have lasted 2-4 seconds. Airspeed remained 165-170KIAS. Identificationthe rolling.the autopilot disconnecting.the stall warbler sounding.causewake turbulence encounter from preceding aircraft. My guess is that buffeting; swirling winds from the wake vortices briefly buffeted the aircraft and the aoa sensors just enough to set off the stall warning system. Responsethe aircraft quickly returned to stable flight. The event ended so quickly that we were still on the glideslope with no perceived loss of altitude or heading. We resumed the approach and landing with no further incident. Just to make sure though; the remainder of the approach was flown approximately 1 dot high and slightly upwind of the centerline. We queried ATC (approach) on the type of preceding aircraft and were told that it was an airbus 321. Suggestionsbetter separation from A-321 aircraft.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CRJ-200 Captain reported wake turbulence in trail of an A321 on a visual approach to CLT.
Narrative: DescriptionWhile on visual approach to 36L at CLT; just after glideslope intercept at CANUK (4000 feet) aircraft encountered wake turbulence from the preceding aircraft approximately 3-4 miles ahead of us. ATC had just assigned a speed of 160KIAS and we were decelerating through 170KIAS. Airspeed was 165-170KIAS during the event with flaps at 20 degrees. The aircraft rapidly rolled to the left; right; left; right. Or; it may have been right; left; right; left. The autopilot kicked off and the stall warbler briefly sounded. As quickly as it started; it ended; and the aircraft automatically returned to stable flight. The entire event may have lasted 2-4 seconds. Airspeed remained 165-170KIAS. IdentificationThe rolling.The autopilot disconnecting.The stall warbler sounding.CauseWake turbulence encounter from preceding aircraft. My guess is that buffeting; swirling winds from the wake vortices briefly buffeted the aircraft and the AOA sensors just enough to set off the stall warning system. ResponseThe aircraft quickly returned to stable flight. The event ended so quickly that we were still on the glideslope with no perceived loss of altitude or heading. We resumed the approach and landing with no further incident. Just to make sure though; the remainder of the approach was flown approximately 1 dot high and slightly upwind of the centerline. We queried ATC (approach) on the type of preceding aircraft and were told that it was an Airbus 321. SuggestionsBetter separation from A-321 aircraft.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.