 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
An air carrier pilot reported that ciu runway 34 approach end very long displaced threshold is not charted on the jeppesen commercial airport chart. The nos chart accurately depicts the environment.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1258959 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201504 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | CIU.Airport |
| State Reference | MI |
| Environment | |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | No Aircraft |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | Captain |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | No Specific Anomaly Occurred All Types |
Narrative:
I have heard from other crewmembers that the charting for ciu does not depict a significant displaced threshold for RWY34. The jeppesen charting does not depict this closed runway; but on airnav.com it is discussed in the airport details and it is on the nos chart. 'Vehicle testing in progress during winter months on sections first officer clsd/abndd parallel twy; southeast of approach end ry 34. Area may be plowed to bare sfc but is not avbl for aircraft arrs or departures.' I believe the jeppesen chart should depict this closed section of runway to prevent inadvertent landing on this pavement. Please compare the nos chart to the jeppesen chart to see what I am referring to. Proper charting of the jeppesen plate would be a good start; and in the interim add a note to the 10-7 page for crews to use caution.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An air carrier pilot reported that CIU Runway 34 approach end very long displaced threshold is not charted on the Jeppesen commercial airport chart. The NOS chart accurately depicts the environment.
Narrative: I have heard from other crewmembers that the charting for CIU does not depict a significant displaced threshold for RWY34. The Jeppesen charting does not depict this closed runway; but on AirNav.com it is discussed in the airport details and it is on the NOS chart. 'VEHICLE TESTING IN PROGRESS DURING WINTER MONTHS ON SECTIONS FO CLSD/ABNDD PARALLEL TWY; SE OF APCH END RY 34. AREA MAY BE PLOWED TO BARE SFC BUT IS NOT AVBL FOR ACFT ARRS OR DEPS.' I believe the Jeppesen chart should depict this closed section of runway to prevent inadvertent landing on this pavement. Please compare the NOS chart to the Jeppesen chart to see what I am referring to. Proper charting of the Jeppesen plate would be a good start; and in the interim add a note to the 10-7 page for crews to use caution.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.