37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1269050 |
Time | |
Date | 201506 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZAU.ARTCC |
State Reference | IL |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 145 ER/LR |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Pitot/Static Ice System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Person 2 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence |
Narrative:
While working our way around thunderstorms that were near chicago; we had pitot 2 freeze over in flight. We had no EICAS message indicating that we had a failure of the pitot heat. We had a cass message indicating that there was a split in the airspeed. As we increased and decreased speed; the first officer's indicated speed remained steady as the captain and standby indicated speed matched. As we descended the first officer showed a decrease in speed as we descended. We had a slight variation in altitude reading between the captain and first officer altimeter. As we descended below FL270 the ice apparently melted as the speed decreased to zero; followed by an increase to match the captain and standby indicated speeds.the aircraft was never in a uas as we controlled the plane by reference to the captain and standby instruments.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: EMB-145LR flight crew reported pitot tube 2 iced up and showed incorrect information. Indications returned to normal when the flight descended into warmer temperatures.
Narrative: While working our way around thunderstorms that were near Chicago; we had pitot 2 freeze over in flight. We had no EICAS message indicating that we had a failure of the pitot heat. We had a CASS message indicating that there was a split in the airspeed. As we increased and decreased speed; the First Officer's indicated speed remained steady as the Captain and standby indicated speed matched. As we descended the First Officer showed a decrease in speed as we descended. We had a slight variation in altitude reading between the Captain and First Officer altimeter. As we descended below FL270 the ice apparently melted as the speed decreased to zero; followed by an increase to match the Captain and standby indicated speeds.The aircraft was never in a UAS as we controlled the plane by reference to the Captain and standby instruments.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.