37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 128282 |
Time | |
Date | 198911 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : den |
State Reference | CO |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 7500 msl bound upper : 7500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : den |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Light Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : atp pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 8500 flight time type : 150 |
ASRS Report | 128282 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
The controller directed our aircraft to turn south after being cleared for a 'visual approach to runway 26L behind the assigned aircraft' on approximately 4 mi final. There were several aircraft landing at this time and the directions were not normal in nature, therefore, my non flying pilot requested verification. The controller confirmed the southerly vector, and then requested 1 min later what we were doing. It was obvious the ATC controller confused our flight number with another company aircraft. The other company aircraft even volunteered to 'identify' for verification. The ATC controller said that both company aircraft were confused and then later admitted that both aircraft voices sounded alike. Mixing aircraft flight numbers due to sound alike voices does not seem reasonable. The flight numbers were xooa and xoba.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CTLR BECAME CONFUSED WITH SIMILAR SOUNDING CALL SIGNS.
Narrative: THE CTLR DIRECTED OUR ACFT TO TURN S AFTER BEING CLRED FOR A 'VISUAL APCH TO RWY 26L BEHIND THE ASSIGNED ACFT' ON APPROX 4 MI FINAL. THERE WERE SEVERAL ACFT LNDG AT THIS TIME AND THE DIRECTIONS WERE NOT NORMAL IN NATURE, THEREFORE, MY NON FLYING PLT REQUESTED VERIFICATION. THE CTLR CONFIRMED THE SOUTHERLY VECTOR, AND THEN REQUESTED 1 MIN LATER WHAT WE WERE DOING. IT WAS OBVIOUS THE ATC CTLR CONFUSED OUR FLT NUMBER WITH ANOTHER COMPANY ACFT. THE OTHER COMPANY ACFT EVEN VOLUNTEERED TO 'IDENT' FOR VERIFICATION. THE ATC CTLR SAID THAT BOTH COMPANY ACFT WERE CONFUSED AND THEN LATER ADMITTED THAT BOTH ACFT VOICES SOUNDED ALIKE. MIXING ACFT FLT NUMBERS DUE TO SOUND ALIKE VOICES DOES NOT SEEM REASONABLE. THE FLT NUMBERS WERE XOOA AND XOBA.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.