37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1299979 |
Time | |
Date | 201510 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | SBA.Airport |
State Reference | CA |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | PA-32 Cherokee Six/Lance/Saratoga/6X |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 31 Flight Crew Total 1610 Flight Crew Type 1500 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude Inflight Event / Encounter Weather / Turbulence Inflight Event / Encounter Unstabilized Approach Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
I was flying IFR to sba. While initially told to expect a visual approach to sba; a heavy rain shower developed and I was repeatedly vectored far to the south of course; and over the pacific ocean; for faster traffic following. I was then cleared for the VOR25 approach and vectored toward the course from a position far to the south over the ocean; and descended prematurely by several miles from 2;100 feet AGL. I should have realized that I was not yet at zacks; but I was still in the visual approach mindset; and descended where I would usually do so for the visual approach. I frequently fly the visual approach into sba. I was given a low altitude alert; and climbed back to the minimum altitude before declaring the airport in sight and landing on a visual approach.when assigned the VOR approach; I should have gone completely into the full mental mode for that approach; despite the unusual entry procedure. I realize that delaying vectors save time in comparison to holding. Even when far over the ocean; it is necessary to observe the minimum altitudes for procedure.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PA32 pilot reported receiving a low altitude alert from ATC when he descended below charted altitude on an instrument approach to SBA.
Narrative: I was flying IFR to SBA. While initially told to expect a visual approach to SBA; a heavy rain shower developed and I was repeatedly vectored far to the south of course; and over the Pacific Ocean; for faster traffic following. I was then cleared for the VOR25 approach and vectored toward the course from a position far to the south over the ocean; and descended prematurely by several miles from 2;100 feet AGL. I should have realized that I was not yet at ZACKS; but I was still in the visual approach mindset; and descended where I would usually do so for the visual approach. I frequently fly the visual approach into SBA. I was given a low altitude alert; and climbed back to the minimum altitude before declaring the airport in sight and landing on a visual approach.When assigned the VOR approach; I should have gone completely into the full mental mode for that approach; despite the unusual entry procedure. I realize that delaying vectors save time in comparison to holding. Even when far over the ocean; it is necessary to observe the minimum altitudes for procedure.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.