37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1303954 |
Time | |
Date | 201510 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Embraer Phenom 300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Normal Brake System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 150 Flight Crew Total 6500 Flight Crew Type 700 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical |
Narrative:
The flight crew is experienced in the aircraft. The pilot flying has 700 hours as the PIC in type and the pilot observing has 400 hours PIC in type. The flight originated less than an hour away. Landing weight was 16;200 lbs. Landing distance was calculated at 3;740 feet for a wet runway. Rain ended approximately 15 minutes prior to landing. Standing water was not visible on the runway. The aircraft landed at vref approximately 400 feet beyond the threshold (600 feet prior to the TDZ markings.) immediately after touchdown; the nose wheel was lowered to the runway and maximum braking was applied. Maximum braking was maintained for the entirety of the landing roll. The aircraft did not decelerate for the majority of the landing roll. During the last 500 feet; the brakes became active and slowed the aircraft to a stop approximately 40 feet prior to the end. Worst case scenario landing performance predicted a maximum ground run of 4100 feet under conditions that were not present at the time of landing. Actual ground run was closer to 4500 feet. This incident was similar to the phenom 300 excursion in september 2014 at conroe texas.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Embraer Phenom 300 Captain reported landing on a 5000 foot wet runway and applying maximum braking; to find that braking was almost nil until the last 500 feet of the runway. At that point braking became very effective and the aircraft stopped just before the end of the runway. He believes this incident is similar to an accident a year ago at CXO.
Narrative: The flight crew is experienced in the aircraft. The pilot flying has 700 hours as the PIC in type and the pilot observing has 400 hours PIC in type. The flight originated less than an hour away. Landing weight was 16;200 lbs. Landing distance was calculated at 3;740 feet for a wet runway. Rain ended approximately 15 minutes prior to landing. Standing water was not visible on the runway. The aircraft landed at Vref approximately 400 feet beyond the threshold (600 feet prior to the TDZ markings.) Immediately after touchdown; the nose wheel was lowered to the runway and maximum braking was applied. Maximum braking was maintained for the entirety of the landing roll. The aircraft did not decelerate for the majority of the landing roll. During the last 500 feet; the brakes became active and slowed the aircraft to a stop approximately 40 feet prior to the end. Worst case scenario landing performance predicted a maximum ground run of 4100 feet under conditions that were not present at the time of landing. Actual ground run was closer to 4500 feet. This incident was similar to the Phenom 300 excursion in September 2014 at Conroe Texas.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.